Atlanta LEO training center protests turn deadly

It’s interesting to see how the different areas respond to these incidents. Some locations call them peaceful protestors let them have their temper tantrums. While others call them terrorist and react accordantly to terror attacks.
 
Is napalm in the APD arsenal?
 
Now that it is clear the actions in Atlanta are led by a core of foreign terrorists financed by (???) the FBI will obviously be right on the case and solve everything within about a week.
The FBI may have instigated the whole event, if past action is any indicator. More than likely their infiltrators were present at the very least.
 
How many people lost their business, jobs, property etc to these clowns while APD and ATL .gov stood by and did nothing during the riots?
Not just ATL, but how many times in the last several years have we seen where govt. and the PD stood by and did nothing while blamtifa did their burn loot murder routine, but then went after the normal person, who was forced to defend themselves, with everything they have and then some?
 
Not just ATL, but how many times in the last several years have we seen where govt. and the PD stood by and did nothing while blamtifa did their burn loot murder routine, but then went after the normal person, who was forced to defend themselves, with everything they have and then some?

Exactly.
 
One 249 , the rest can provide cover and the field will be cleared quickly.

They don't even need to do that. They can take a page out of the Israeli's playbook: rubber bullets, water cannons, sound cannons, and CS. But if they are being attacked with anything deadly, then yeah, I am OK with that.
 
They don't even need to do that. They can take a page out of the Israeli's playbook: rubber bullets, water cannons, sound cannons, and CS. But if they are being attacked with anything deadly, then yeah, I am OK with that.
And the other side can escalate too. There's an old expression, something about your enemy getting a say so too.
 
Not to worry - NYT has this as a 'disturbance' with 'property damage' from 'protesters.'

View attachment 591858
I wonder whether this would be considered a disturbance if they similarly attacked the New York Times offices. 🤪
 
I’d like to see this get more airtime so we can stop pretending it’s peaceful disturbances by locals that don’t like the policies…
i turned my tv on a bit ago and it was getting a blurb on fox news

Not to worry - NYT has this as a 'disturbance' with 'property damage' from 'protesters.'
the left has worked hard to normalize political violence for the past 2 years. the overton window has made it that throwing molotov cocktails at a govt org is just normal protesting. why would they call it anything other than a 'disturbance'? the only reason they would say it was anything more would be if it was our team doing this against a school board or some other leftist group
 
Why do so many gun owners support law enforcement, when law enforcement historically and currently enforces gun control, tyranny, and victimless crimes?
In my case, because I don’t have the phone numbers of Egon Spengler, Peter Venkman and Ray Stantz. 😉
 
In my case, because I don’t have the phone numbers of Egon Spengler, Peter Venkman and Ray Stantz. 😉
I don’t get it. Are you historically being robbed by ghosts?
 
SPLC attorney arrested and they are standing behind him. Meaning one of the groups the FBI uses to identify domestic terrorism is actively cooperating with domestic terrorists


 
SPLC attorney arrested and they are standing behind him. Meaning one of the groups the FBI uses to identify domestic terrorism is actively cooperating with domestic terrorists
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
 
SPLC attorney arrested and they are standing behind him. Meaning one of the groups the FBI uses to identify domestic terrorism is actively cooperating with domestic terrorists




We shouldn’t be surprised. For years, whatever the left has accused us of is exactly what they are doing.
 
I see this as the beginning, or maybe the middle, of the end for antifa. It appears to me that the most extreme in the group are inciting violence before the less extreme has prepared either the population or their financial backers for that violence. They aren’t a fighting force, they are just a mob. They’ll inevitably go to far, perhaps bomb a police station or a federal building, and their support will evaporate.
 
I see this as the beginning, or maybe the middle, of the end for antifa. It appears to me that the most extreme in the group are inciting violence before the less extreme has prepared either the population or their financial backers for that violence. They aren’t a fighting force, they are just a mob. They’ll inevitably go to far, perhaps bomb a police station or a federal building, and their support will evaporate.

Uh, they’ve already done both of those things. Yet here they are. They are the brown shirts for the Democrat Party so they have cover in a lot of areas.
 
Uh, they’ve already done both of those things. Yet here they are. They are the brown shirts for the Democrat Party so they have cover in a lot of areas.
Agreed, they are the modern equivalent of the Brownshirts. Even in Nazi Germany, they had the term Beefsteaks, brown outside, red inside.
 
Uh, they’ve already done both of those things. Yet here they are. They are the brown shirts for the Democrat Party so they have cover in a lot of areas.

It's splitting hairs really, but look into Mussolini's black shirts. It's an even closer resemblance than the brown shirts IMO.

Oddly enough, the European ANTIFA at the time were fighting the black shirts fiercely. But it was a strange bedfellows of Catholics, Italian Patriots, and communists.
 
Back
Top Bottom