What did this NYPD Detective know about corruption?

did they form a circle around the suspect and open fire?

what happens to the know your target and whats beyond?
 
1:22 is where the story unfolds BTW.

Not a lot of detail there, the scenario that plays in my head is detective and sgt, most likely plainclothes or very near as detectives usually are, were first on scene shot at suspect and retreated out the door, other responding officers outside saw two dudes with guns come out and shot them.

Right or wrong it's not the first time a cop shot another because they saw a man with a gun at an alleged crime scene. Same reason it's generally advised in SD/HD situations to get any potential weapon out of your hand once you know they're on scene.
 
That may be true but do you think he could have risen to the rank of detective without knowing and looking the other way on it?
Corruption inevitably leads to the murder of innocent people even if they justify the corruption as being for the greater good. Maybe he found he could not go that far or tolerate something he found out.
Recall that Cuomo killed the public corruption he created when he realized that they thought they were actually supposed to investigate all public corruption. They got on a trail of evidence leading to him. So he killed off the commission and buried the files.
 
1:22 is where the story unfolds BTW.

Not a lot of detail there, the scenario that plays in my head is detective and sgt, most likely plainclothes or very near as detectives usually are, were first on scene shot at suspect and retreated out the door, other responding officers outside saw two dudes with guns come out and shot them.

Right or wrong it's not the first time a cop shot another because they saw a man with a gun at an alleged crime scene. Same reason it's generally advised in SD/HD situations to get any potential weapon out of your hand once you know they're on scene.
And, didn't the NYPD top cop say that officers had STK orders on anyone they saw with a gun? Or something very close to that? It was said when the national reciprocity was being discussed.
 
Cause you know so much about cops.

I know that right now they're rolling around with military weapons in military vehicles and shooting people and their pets because their murder hard got in the way of reading the address they were storming.
 
I know that right now they're rolling around with military weapons in military vehicles and shooting people and their pets because their murder hard got in the way of reading the address they were storming.
Right, 700,000 cops in this country and every one just goes around shooting people and pets for fun. I wonder why we only ever heard about a couple of times and still can't decide if they were in the wrong about it.

I hear the cops in England are great and fair, maybe you can go back there if it's so intolerable here.
 
Right, 700,000 cops in this country and every one just goes around shooting people and pets for fun. I wonder why we only ever heard about a couple of times and still can't decide if they were in the wrong about it.

I hear the cops in England are great and fair, maybe you can go back there if it's so intolerable here.

This country isn't intolerable, but law enforcement's behaviour isn't so lily white and flawless as certain cop fellating members here like to preach.

And when you assume authority for policing the rest of us your behaviour is supposed to be above reproach, so even a tiny proportion of abuses is intolerable.
 
Last edited:
This country isn't intolerable, but law enforcement's behaviour isn't so lily white and flawless as certain cop fellating members here like to preach.

And when you assume authority for policing the rest of us your behaviour is supposed to be above reproach, so even a tiny proportion of abuses is intolerable.
Any abuses that have been proven weren't tolerated. It's probably wise that the world doesn't recognize you as the arbiter of what constitutes abuse.

You might want to watch your insults here or at least have the balls to say them outright.
 
Any abuses that have been proven weren't tolerated. It's probably wise that the world doesn't recognize you as the arbiter of what constitutes abuse.

You might want to watch your insults here or at least have the balls to say them outright.

Fine, you're a blinkered kowtowing lickspittle apologist for every goose stepping authority abusing wannabe fascist cop that is discussed here. Your attitude is repugnant to me and your moral compass when it comes to police abusing their authority resembles a windmill in a hurricane in how often you veer about to prove our boys in blue are paragons of virtue.

Clear enough? Now run off and tell the authorities on me. Maybe they'll pat you on the head like a good quisling.
 
Last edited:
Fine, you're a blinkered kowtowing lickspittle apologist for every goose stepping authority abusing wannabe fascist cop that is discussed here. Your attitude is repugnant to me and your moral compass when it comes to police abusing their authority resembles a windmill in a hurricane in how often you veer about to prove our boys in blue are paragons of virtue.

Clear enough? Now run off and tell the authorities on me. Maybe they'll pat you on the head like a good quisling.
I like you too!
 
Fine, you're a blinkered kowtowing lickspittle apologist for every goose stepping authority abusing wannabe fascist cop that is discussed here. Your attitude is repugnant to me and your moral compass when it comes to police abusing their authority resembles a windmill in a hurricane in how often you veer about to prove our boys in blue are paragons of virtue.

Clear enough? Now run off and tell the authorities on me. Maybe they'll pat you on the head like a good quisling.
I like you too!
You two, get a room already
 
I know that right now they're rolling around with military weapons in military vehicles and shooting people and their pets because their murder hard got in the way of reading the address they were storming.

You can roll around in a Hummvee with your AR if you want to also.
 
That's it, wait until I'm at the range for the afternoon and start this crap without me...... How many times have I asked that you hold these conversations until I'm present.....

As to the subject, I could tell the police comish was lying from the very get go, his lips were moving.....
 
Fine, you're a blinkered kowtowing lickspittle apologist for every goose stepping authority abusing wannabe fascist cop that is discussed here. Your attitude is repugnant to me and your moral compass when it comes to police abusing their authority resembles a windmill in a hurricane in how often you veer about to prove our boys in blue are paragons of virtue.

Clear enough? Now run off and tell the authorities on me. Maybe they'll pat you on the head like a good quisling.
You're my hero.
 
What did this NYPD Detective know about corruption?

Clintons


Well, there's only two choices, right?
Conspiracy or incompetence.
 
Last edited:
The only thing cops worry about is getting that pay check, they do care about right or wrong, just do what the politicians tell them to do. How many cops on this board would quit their jobs before doing a "red flag" gun confiscation?
 
But their all paid with public funds....so that makes their behavior that much more despicable when it is proven they break the law, or even appear to be above it.
And that's what gets me all fired up. I'm supposed to go to work like a good little debt slave, and eat crow. Their sins will find them out.
 
So, is this the detective that was responding to a robbery while off duty? Can't really watch the vid right now. If so, that's a recipe for a problem. And not the first time it's happened. All the talk about a CCP holder getting shot by cops, seems they shoot more of their own like this than permit holders. At the end of the day just because you know you're a cop, or you say you're a cop, does not mean responding officers know it.
 
Back
Top Bottom