Exspiravit
Mell-Known Wember
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
Benefactor
Life Member
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
.
Last edited:
The Naiguata was built in 2009 by Spainās Navantia shipyards as a coastal patrol ship and displaced 1,453 tons. The Naiguata was 259 feet long and had a top speed of 22 knots. This ship was also armed with a 76-millimeter Oto-Melara rapid fire deck gun, 35-millimeter Oerlikon Millennium close-in weapon system, and two .50-caliber machine guns. As a surface ship, Naiguata typically embarks with a crew of 34.
The Resolute, built in 1993, is 400 feet long and 59 feet wide. It displaces 8,378 tons and normally carries up to 146 passengers.
RCGS Resolute is a purpose built polar expedition vessel of the highest ice class, rated 1A Super, designed to operate in difficult ice conditions.
Despite the guns, the warship was out classed. It was like running into the proverbial brick wall, only tougher. Captian, I think they scratched the paint.
Might want to check the article, that wasn't all:"Despite the guns..."
Actually, it's IN SPITE of the guns.
There's a reason warships have weapons...and that's to engage others AT A DISTANCE.
If they had actually done that instead of trying to brute-force shove another ship which out massed them by nearly a factor of 6, this wouldn't have happened. Heavy construction or not, that cruise ship would not have withstood being shot up with those guns.
The Law of Gross Tonnage isn't just a good idea in 72 COLREGS...it's effin' physics.
So, either they are really lousy shots, or their guns are made as well as their ships.BERLIN ā A Venezuelan navy ship fired shots at a German-owned cruise ship on March 30 and rammed into the passenger vessel, leading to the sinking of the warship in the Caribbean.
Hey! Wasn't there a thread about this? Pretty sure I signed up...we could all be pirates!
Might want to check the article, that wasn't all:
So, either they are really lousy shots, or their guns are made as well as their ships.
Would it be rude for a kill logo to be painted on the cruise ship's superstructure?
Would it be rude for a kill logo to be painted on the cruise ship's superstructure?
Good point.Given that they apparently wanted the ship (because they were attempting to force it into port), they obviously weren't intending to actually shell it.
Given that they apparently wanted the ship (because they were attempting to force it into port), they obviously weren't intending to actually shell it.