better hide your "ghost guns"

It would require effort, initiative, and prior planning. Strike one, strike two, and strike three.
Shenanigans, that's what this is !
 
trcubed;n89174 said:
How about we 'compromise' and do away with all firearm regulations period.

Agreed- first NFA then GCA '68. For some, that's just too much freedom though- they'd have to be responsible for all of their actions/decisions.
Me? I just want to be left alone.

And to not have to read fudd mutterings...
 
I can't hide my ghost guns. They make too much dang noise.
 
eddie0225;n89003 said:
exactly that was my point if you can do all this then you can make good money and not have to worry about jail or death

But then you have to pay taxes and buy health insurance.
 
12151791;n87612 said:
yeah right, a criminal is going to go through the trouble of putting a rifle together from an 80% receiver when they can buy pretty much any firearm off the streets or maybe just get it from fast & furious thanks to AG Holder

Nah, they get gonna get themselves a gat some other way. Just saw on the news this morning that the owner of the Army a Navy Surplus store in a High Point was found shot to death in his store and a bunch of handguns were stolen. No leads on the case yet.
 
eddie0225;n89003 said:
exactly that was my point if you can do all this then you can make good money and not have to worry about jail or death

Don't want to work, easier to rob someone of a couple hundred to hold them over from welfare check to welfare check. Plus makes them look bad to the other hoodies
 
Errant_Venture;n89559 said:
I can't actually find a reason to argue with that. Within reason.

You were on the right track until you added those last two words. The Founders intended the Right to Keep and Bear Arms to be unlimited by any person or entity...hence the word "infringed" they included in wording the Second Amendment.
 
trcubed;n89615 said:
You were on the right track until you added those last two words. The Founders intended the Right to Keep and Bear Arms to be unlimited by any person or entity...hence the word "infringed" they included in wording the Second Amendment.

All good things in moderation. I'd start to get worried when people start mounting cannons with ratings in the 40mm+ range on vehicles.
 
JohnFreeman;n87630 said:
The aluminum ones only take a few hours. Of course that would be breaking the law for a felon to create a firearm, but.... let's see.... he'd be...a felon....

That is the point. Ostensibly a felon could legally obtain an 80% receiver, finish it, and assemble a gun. However once it's a finished firearm, said felon is in violation of the law. Therefore there is no loophole. Also if a felon is bound and determined to obtain a firearm, the felon will find a way. This is simply more obfuscation from the anti's.
 
Errant_Venture;n89682 said:
All good things in moderation. I'd start to get worried when people start mounting cannons with ratings in the 40mm+ range on vehicles.

I bet if you paid the tax you could get an M1 Abrams with a dozen rounds of ammo.
 
Joker18;n89780 said:
That is the point. Ostensibly a felon could legally obtain an 80% receiver, finish it, and assemble a gun. However once it's a finished firearm, said felon is in violation of the law.

Well I'm sure that would stop him, right guys?
 
Errant_Venture;89682 said:
All good things in moderation. I'd start to get worried when people start mounting cannons with ratings in the 40mm+ range on vehicles.

Why? We donated plenty of those to the FSA / ISIS / Daesh courtesy of Obunghole.... seemed legit
 
Here is an interesting twist on the 80% lowers....
Man who used CNC mill to make untraceable guns sentenced to 41 months

Crowninshield, known online as "Dr. Death," would sell unfinished AR-15 lower receivers, which customers would then pay for him to transform into fully machined lower receivers using a computer numerically controlled (CNC) mill. (snip)

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, said that Crowninshield "owned and operated a machine shop where he allowed customers with unknown backgrounds to use his machinery to unlawfully manufacture firearms for profit.
So which is it? Did he manufacture them or did he let them use equipment? Of course this happened in Commie-forni-stan.

Link: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...make-untraceable-guns-sentenced-to-41-months/
 
"In order to create the pretext that the individual in such a scenario was building his or her own firearm, the skilled machinist would often have the individual press a button or put his or her hands on a piece of machinery so that the individual could claim that the individual, rather than the machinist, made the firearm,"


Sorry - but he sounds like a dumbass that was asking to get arrested.
 
Joker18;n91913 said:
Yeah, that was awful! I thought we would never be rescued!

We wouldn't have sunk if there wasn't 4,265 of us on that boat with all our firearms. Lol
 
Sneakymedic;n92621 said:
We wouldn't have sunk if there wasn't 4,265 of us on that boat with all our firearms. Lol

The fact is that govco only gets away all this infringement under the guise of "regulation" because people aren't standing up to them. Look, I have no illusions that they will ever do the right thing because it is the right thing, nor do I ever expect the politicians to do the right thing and eliminate it or groups like the BATFE (or BADFTL as it will be known in the future, at least by those who play Fallout 4). The fact is that the "enforcers" are outnumbered thousands to one (which is why I quoted you, the 4265 of us reference) and only doing what they're doing because of a paycheck, not because they are committed to a cause.

The people could put a stop to this if they wanted to. The thing is that it is going to take someone to say NO and stand up, unfortunately undoubtedly at great cost.
 
Back
Top Bottom