Hell Yes, We Will Take Your AR15

A serious presidential candidates debate, and he proposes doing something that has no constitutional support at all. Even if he wins, he will have no authority to take anyone's AR-15, or their squirt gun. No one in America has that authority, and they never will, until the constitution is amended to give the government that power. The emotional rationaliation for such unlawful action makes no difference at all. It is simply not a power that the government has. But the reaction to his blustering shows how much contempt many people have for the constitution, and how little they care if it is ignored.

So, Robert Francis, do your best to get the constitution amended to your liking, and then you can take everyone's AR-15. Until then, your are blowing smoke.
 
... But the reaction to his blustering shows how much contempt many people have for the constitution, and how little they care if it is ignored. ...

Many schools no longer teach civics and have not done so for many years. Consequently, a sizable portion of the population has no real understanding of the Constitution and only a vague idea that the Constitution somehow protects some nebulously conceived "rights."
 
Many schools no longer teach civics and have not done so for many years. Consequently, a sizable portion of the population has no real understanding of the Constitution and only a vague idea that the Constitution somehow protects some nebulously conceived "rights."

Almost like it was part of some 50 year plan......
 
Almost like it was part of some 50 year plan......
Yeah, the rise of communism. There was a time not all that long ago I would have thought that idea was nuts. Trump beating their Queen made them crazy enough to remove the masks. They’re acting much like they did back in Weimar Germany. Thankfully we have history as a warning.
 
I hear you Beto. You did not stutter when you stated that If elected, you will take our weapons. You are talking to an ex-lawman. I was well acquainted with evil men. I made it my work to chase down the baddest of the bad. I am under no illusion as to what good people of tender hearts are up against. I hear you.

On the 15th of February 1971, five lawmen gave up their guns to Rene Guzman and Leonardo Lopez in West Dallas. The five handcuffed deputies were driven down to a dirt road between the Trinity River and its levee and told to get out of the vehicle. It was then that Deputy Samuel Garcia Infante told his fellow deputies, "They're going to kill us, boys!"

Infante barreled into Lopez and was shot and killed. Deputy William Reese, having managed to work his hands free, took a swing at Guzman but missed. He was shot and killed. The execution of Deputy A. J. Robertson followed. Deputy Wendell Dover was shot in the chest but survived despite being badly wounded. Only Deputy A. D. McCurley escaped by throwing himself over the embankment and rolling to the river's edge.

Three good and decent Christian men were shot and executed and a fourth badly wounded by murderous thugs armed with stolen pistols. They did what no lawman ought ever to do. They gave up their weapons.

Evil men the likes of Rene Guzman and Leonardo Lopez abound. You Beto, and other politicians of your ilk have the right to make your impassioned but misguided speeches. Stop there.

Sadly, it may be coming one day. In the hands of a Beto (by his own admission) we may very well get the oppressive government the Founding Fathers warned against. Against such came the inspiration from God for our Divine Constitution, which takes into account the 2nd Amendment.

We would do well to remember the warning given by John Adams. “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

Is it not now time to humbly repent of our sins and return to the God of this land, who is Jesus Christ?
 
It didn’t take long to get a confession, and the trial was quick. A jury found Guzman and Lopez guilty and sentenced them to death. That would have been the end of the story, were it not for Henry Wade, Dallas’ legendary district attorney. Wade had not prosecuted a case since the Jack Ruby trial. While he let Doug Mulder, his No. 1 assistant, handle the Guzman and Lopez trial, Wade himself wanted to make the closing argument. He was up for re-election and decided the free publicity wouldn’t hurt. His speech was impassioned, but it was also riddled with inaccuracies and improper conduct. Owing to those mistakes and, too, because the Supreme Court ruled a year later that the death penalty was unconstitutional, an appeals court tossed out the verdict and ordered a new trial. The second trial was nearly a straight replay of the first, only instead of getting the electric chair, Guzman and Lopez were given quadruple life sentences.

In 1991, Lopez, to everyone’s surprise, was deemed rehabilitated and paroled after serving only 16 years. His new life as a free man was short-lived, however, and he returned to prison, where he and Guzman both remain to this day.

https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/january/trinity-river-massacre-manhunt-1971/
 
It didn’t take long to get a confession, and the trial was quick. A jury found Guzman and Lopez guilty and sentenced them to death. That would have been the end of the story, were it not for Henry Wade, Dallas’ legendary district attorney. Wade had not prosecuted a case since the Jack Ruby trial. While he let Doug Mulder, his No. 1 assistant, handle the Guzman and Lopez trial, Wade himself wanted to make the closing argument. He was up for re-election and decided the free publicity wouldn’t hurt. His speech was impassioned, but it was also riddled with inaccuracies and improper conduct. Owing to those mistakes and, too, because the Supreme Court ruled a year later that the death penalty was unconstitutional, an appeals court tossed out the verdict and ordered a new trial. The second trial was nearly a straight replay of the first, only instead of getting the electric chair, Guzman and Lopez were given quadruple life sentences.

In 1991, Lopez, to everyone’s surprise, was deemed rehabilitated and paroled after serving only 16 years. His new life as a free man was short-lived, however, and he returned to prison, where he and Guzman both remain to this day.

https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/january/trinity-river-massacre-manhunt-1971/
Should have shot em
 
Beto trying hard to be just like Ted Kennedy.
 
Last edited:
The last guy in line is the compliance officer. He's there to make sure the other officers comply with orders. The officer in front of him apparently said something like, "This is wrong."

;)
Reminds me of the political officer that used to be on soviet boomer subs.
 
You mean Captain Second Rank Ivan Yurievich Putin?

View attachment 154318
From the mother of all sub movies.

My wife can't stand them. All she has to hear is, "conn. Sonar, new contact bearing 281 making turns for 5 knots, designated Sierra one" and she is OUT of there.
 
Ya know, I was refraining on writing this, but eff it. Maybe more like a John/Robert Kennedy?
One could have thought he was tje way the media were falling all over themselves over him till Bootyjudge came along.

And he came pretty close to beating ted cruz. Not that im a huge fan but thats scary as hell. Dems would absolutely love for texas to turn blue
 
One could have thought he was tje way the media were falling all over themselves over him till Bootyjudge came along.

And he came pretty close to beating ted cruz. Not that im a huge fan but thats scary as hell. Dems would absolutely love for texas to turn blue

I meant in 63 and 68.
 
It only constitutes a deaththreat if Bozo I mean Beto is saying he is willing to use deadly force to take it
There is no law anywhere that the state is not willing to use deadly force to enact it. Ask that dude they killed in NYC for selling loosie cigarettes on the corner.

Any law is a death threat if the state issues it.
 
PSA is already all over it:
nobeto.jpg


https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa...eceiver-preorder-item-8-9-weeks-delivery.html
 

"I am here to say: Hell, no, you’re not," Lauren Boebert told O'Rourke during a town hall event in Aurora, Colo., passionately defending her rights under the Second Amendment.

"I have four children, I am 5-foot-0, 100 pounds, I cannot really defend myself with a fist. ... I want to know how you're going to legislate that because a criminal breaks the law, so all you're going to do is restrict law-abiding citizens, like myself."


According to the Denver Post, 32-year-old Boebert drove three hours from the town of Rifle to the event and is the owner of a restaurant where the staff carries firearms. As she spoke, a handgun was holstered at her side.

Many in the crowd tried to shout over Boebert as she spoke, but O'Rourke intervened, calling on the audience to be "respectful" and let her speak.

"Self-defense is a right that we have that shall not be infringed in America," Boebert said.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom