Violate Your Oath And Turn On American Citizens At Your Legal Peril

The other side? The side opposite of Liberty? As long as Oaths were taken seriously and honored with fidelity, what other side needs consideration?



Ignoring that most officers see their own shadows as a threat for a second, this thread is composed of nothing but words. If words make officers fear for their lives enough to aggressively pursue violence, then it's time to have a serious discussion about getting rid of police.



I doubt this, given that some studies show nearly half of officers beat their spouses.



There is always a choice. Not always a convenient or good one, but there is always a choice.



So because someone is exercising their First Amendment-protected Rights to unequivocally assert they will not willingly give up their Second Amendment-protected Rights, scared men with authority will conspire to seperate you from both, if not your Life?

Land of the Free, huh?

And it's not the same decision. They are exact opposite decisions.

One is choosing to insert yourself into an immoral situation to visit violence and death on a fellow human being to coerce obedience to the scribblings of politicians.

The other is a choice to prevent such violence and death from making you a slave to those in power.

One is to go on offense and take the inalienable Rights of people by force.

The other is to defend one's Life, the lives of those he loves, one's Liberty and the Liberty of his children and millions yet unborn, and the pursuit of his own happiness and that of posterity.

You want to know how no one faces danger?

Law Dog doesn't hide his conscience behind a tin shield and keeps his ass at home instead of violently enforcing unjust and immoral laws. Then no one has to be scared. No one has to murder to make sure he goes home at the end of shift. No one has to hear bagpipes anytime soon.



With only the force necessary to
diffuse an incident or to protect themselves or others from harm.



Say it with me....... police officers are mere civilians too.



Once again, for those in the back: the police are mere civilians too.



Which is exactly why only a moron or overly sensitive boob of an officer could read any of it as a threat.

If anything, it's a "I don't want any trouble. If you likewise don't want any, and don't look to stir up any, then there won't be any" thread.

Exactly what I was hoping! Freedom of thought, and consideration of all facets of the decision that will eventually be made by all free Americans.
 
Think of the redcoats in 1775. Think of the militias that rose up and countered them. Today we have the redcoats. The militias are lacking. Like the redcoats our boys in blue will also think they’re the good guys. Won’t change what needs to or will happen, however.

I am still waiting on you to declare yourself Colonel of the 1st Carolina Militia and start standing up to these horrid redcoats...or are we still just all waiting for “someone” to do it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Mac, I think you are dead on the money! I am also certain you don't need to hear from me that I agree to make your life fulfilled but I really think this is On The Money!!!!

Thank you! I remain somewhat fulfilled from shooting that 500 B&M at Battery Oaks!

BatteryOaksBilly said:
Google RX 84

That is a good, recent example of what government will do to maintain it's authority. It will plan go to the extreme: Absolute Tyranny. I know people who have worked on Continuity of Government... they said that little acronym "COG" was more powerful than any rank or clearance.

The first example of the extreme use of government to force social change, against the constitution, for moral reasons, was the war that Lincoln brought against the CSA. Regardless of which side you would have taken, or take now, it is a fact that Lincoln thought he was morally correct, and that the good he was doing over ruled the constitution. He forced social change using the tyranny of government. It happened, and it can happen again.
 
Last edited:
Exactly what I was hoping! Freedom of thought, and consideration of all facets of the decision that will eventually be made by all free Americans.

Brother, my hopes are that no such time will come to pass. No sane person would wish to see such a bloodletting.

But men often cling to hope, despite all evidence that hope offers just a glimmer of success. It's in our nature.
 
Lets remember the reason that brought on these recent gun discussions ( locally & national ) being the Evil acts in El Paso, Midland Texas & Dayton Ohio.
In all three tragedies there were signs that were not acted on or ignored for an opportunity to intervene .
For a short time it was how to ID at risk behavior with using firearms which turned full time to how to dis-arm America, and continues while ignoring finding solutions to what originally started this,,, discussion.


Laws would pass. Laws (by very definition) are “legal” until they are changed or overturned by a court.
Due Process ( Ignored ?)



Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
Annotation

Primary Holding
Congress does not have the power to pass laws that override the Constitution, such as by expanding the scope of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction.
Facts
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/

It would be a slow-process war of attrition, and only very rarely will an INDIVIDUAL stand up for what they think is “right”, and that person will pay with jail time or their life.
The people who take their freedom or life will do so completely legally and without consequence.

To prove my point, I offer as evidence..... NYC, Chicago, California, New York State, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Washington D.C., the 1994 AWB, the Gun Control Act of 1968. AND... The PATRIOT act.

To the above I agree and I personally would classify the above infringements as a testing or proving ground by way of a "Luke Warm Enema."

So, back to Beto & The Left's inference of just passing a law(?) or an Executive Order (for American's to turn in its firearms) as either would amount to an "Enema with Sulfuric Acid."

I am FAR from a history major ( or minor ) but I believe the closest event in history that sets a prescient for receiving a "Sulfuric Acid Enema" can be reviewed with what happened at Lexington and Concord.

SO,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Stop thinking there will be some sort of “round up” where like-minded people will organize and resist

I would hope that our representatives ( national & state ) would get off the Crazy Train of Dis-Arming Americans and get back to finding solutions to address individuals that need help.

Also, seems that Gov Abbott has found somethings to try and is implementing them.

Gov. Greg Abbott issues eight executive orders aimed at stopping potential mass shooters
https://www.texastribune.org/2019/0...leases-executive-orders-after-mass-shootings/



F W I W
 
Last edited:
I would like to hope that American Citizens such as those of us here have a “line in the sand” that once crossed will trigger forceful resistance, let me put it this way, if laws are passed that turn me into a criminal, I may choose to find out who is willing to give their life to strip my freedoms as much as I am willing to give up mine to protect them, at that point I’ll be a criminal so I may as well do criminal shit.
 
Back
Top Bottom