11 children rescued from ‘extremist’ men at ‘filthy’ hideout

Last edited:
cubrock said:
Story out of Statesville in local news today. Woman charged with several counts of statutory rape stemming from a relationship with a 15 year old foster child. Gets $275K bond. But in NM, starving kids and allowing one to die, then covering it up, gets you $20K bond. For some reason, the contrast really hit me when I heard the Statesville story on the radio today.

http://www.whky.com/archive/item/22245-woman-charged-with-statutory-rape-of-15-year-old#.W3WgGKQpCaM
Click to expand...

She's a melanin-deficient person who likely doesn't adhere to the Religion of Peace (TM).

Of course her bond is astronomically higher. It's her Privilege Mark-up.
 
Cowboy said:
Not the judges fault. The DA should be impeached/recalled/shot take your pick.
Click to expand...

I don't think the judge should get to hide behind the "just following orders/law" excuse, but I understand that my initial imagery might have been overly symmetric.

How about "shot, executed, and sent to the Russian front?"
 
GreatGazoo said:
I don't think the judge should get to hide behind the "just following orders/law" excuse, but I understand that my initial imagery might have been overly symmetric.

How about "shot, executed, and sent to the Russian front?"
Click to expand...

We just had thread about how we should have judges that want to be umpires not players. Just remember that judicial activism in either direction is still activism. They should interpret the laws and allow the the laws to be imposed. Just by chance they also allow stupid laws to be exposed.
 
Last edited:
georgel said:
Can it be any clearer?

Wahhaj Sr.......He previously predicted U.S. democracy would "crumble" and be supplanted by Islam, adding it is "our duty as Muslims to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Quran."
Click to expand...

Keep dreaming, jack*ss:mad:

It's our duty as citizens to preserve it.
 
Last edited:
Cowboy said:
We just had thread about how we should have judges that want to be umpires not players. Just remember that judicial activism in either direction is still activism. They should interpret the laws and allow the the laws to be imposed. Just by chance they also allow stupid laws to be exposed.
Click to expand...

We've also had documented hundreds if not thousands of years of history of men hiding their immoral and unjust acts behind the mask of just doing what they were told; obeying orders; and following the law.

Sorry that I missed the thread wherein CFF settled the matter of legal positivism for all time.
 
So if the charges are gone, do the feds rebuild their house? I mean, these guys were imprisoned, not charged, and released. So by rule of law they did nothing wrong, yet still have no where to live because the .gov bulldozed their house. Sure it's a shack or compound or whatever, but still, it didn't belong to the .gov yet they destroyed it and basically took property from people who were not convicted of doing anything.

Not taking their side, just pointing out the injustice perpetrated on presumed innocent people.
 
As much as it sucks ... due process. What really sucks is if the state does take this to a Grand Jury (which is still possible) these POS’s will likely be long gone and hiding in Michigan, Minnesota or some other heavy muslim population area.
 
Jayne said:
So if the charges are gone, do the feds rebuild their house? I mean, these guys were imprisoned, not charged, and released. So by rule of law they did nothing wrong, yet still have no where to live because the .gov bulldozed their house. Sure it's a shack or compound or whatever, but still, it didn't belong to the .gov yet they destroyed it and basically took property from people who were not convicted of doing anything.

Not taking their side, just pointing out the injustice perpetrated on presumed innocent people.
Click to expand...
It doesn't seem to be clear who actually razed the structure (s). Possibly the property owner.

https://www.taosnews.com/stories/authorities-quiet-on-razing-of-amalia-compound,51184

But, from what I'm reading, the suspects have been newly charged and the old charges can still be re-filed. I think there was a procedural error on the DA's part
 
Last edited:
georgel said:
It doesn't seem to be clear who actually razed the structure (s). Possibly the property owner.

https://www.taosnews.com/stories/authorities-quiet-on-razing-of-amalia-compound,51184

But, from what I'm reading, the suspects have been newly charged and the old charges can still be re-filed. I think there was a procedural error on the DA's part
Click to expand...

Yes...not being an attorney, it's my understanding that what happened was a procedural violation and has nothing whatsoever to do with concepts such as the statute of limitations, violations of rights (such as not being informed of their Miranda Rights), improper handling of evidence, etc. So it's likely the DA will bring charges up again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom