Article: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg: More Gun Control Needed to Prevent Second Civil War

[Button Pusher]

A recent report by the Center for Gun Violence Solutions, which is part of Johns Hopkins (Michael) Bloomberg School of Public Health,
conflates private gun ownership with armed insurrection in order to advocate for expanded gun control.

Johns Hopkins: More Gun Control Needed to Prevent Second Civil War

A recent report by the Center for Gun Violence Solutions conflates private gun ownership with armed insurrection in order to advocate for expanded gun control.

www.ammoland.com

 

[Ferrisfan]

Gun control- The cause of and solution to civil war (according to Johns Hopkins).

 

[NCLivingBrit]

More like more needed to start it, but what do I know?

 

[Stick]

No surprise here, given where this is coming from. I mean, how can you have a leftist totalitarian state when the citizens are armed as well as the government enforcers?

 

[Les White]

TL;DR

We're going to keep pissing off these armed-to-the-teeth gun owners and eventually they're going to revolt, so we need to disarm them first.

 

[Windini]

TL;DR

Dang. Not adept enough to make my post do what I want it to do...

 

[Grits]

Every year the line towards CWII inches closer and closer. Those who are trying to rewrite history are doomed to repeat it.

 

[Flashpoint]

Armed rebellion is a fundamental right and the ultimate check on the power of the ruling class that our forefathers reserved for us with the 2A.

Anyone attempting to take that away is planning to do things we would shoot them for if we could.

 

[chiefjason]

But no mention of the protests the summer before that? Weird? I mean, some of those protesters were armed. And lots of violence and destruction to go with it.

As usually, the left wants to start their narrative in the middle. And like happens a lot, that middle is the reaction to what they were doing. And they completely ignore their behaviors that led up to that reaction. And just blame their political enemies with no regard to history or motives. It's getting old.

 

[NCLivingBrit]

But no mention of the protests the summer before that? Weird? I mean, some of those protesters were armed. And lots of violence and destruction to go with it.

As usually, the left wants to start their narrative in the middle. And like happens a lot, that middle is the reaction to what they were doing. And they completely ignore their behaviors that led up to that reaction. And just blame their political enemies with no regard to history or motives. It's getting old.

BLM burning down a downtown of a city is inherently peaceful. White people legally owning guns is inherently racist terrorism. Duh

 

[Mathieu18]

At least they’re finally openly saying what they want to do. Respect for that, but it isn’t going to work.

 

[rdinatal]

 

[RetiredUSNChief]

Dear Johns Hopkins,

Have a nice, piping hot cuppa STFU with a side order of pack sand.

History has proven time and again that insurrections/civil wars that you're so afraid of are, in fact, one-sidedly bloodier when the people are not armed than they are when the people are armed.


Now...while you're chewing on that, I've a bung that could use a bit of oral bidet work by you before you get down to writing more liberal BS.

 

[HMP]

Yo, can we take a moment to just stand up and applaud BP for having more than just a link in a first post?

 

[backwoodsshooter]

News flash scooter, that train has already left the station

 

[Slimer]