Bumpstock ban defeated.

Article 6 US Constitution, also known as the Supremacy Clause.

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
 
Article 6 US Constitution, also known as the Supremacy Clause.
Still subject to being limited to the powers explicitly granted to Uncle. If one tries to argue that this falls under the second, which a Uncle has also said is binding to the states, then it becomes a question of what is the definition of infringement.
 
Still subject to being limited to the powers explicitly granted to Uncle. If one tries to argue that this falls under the second, which a Uncle has also said is binding to the states, then it becomes a question of what is the definition of infringement.
Sounds like a valid argument to me.
 
If I owned one, Drumph’s first step in getting me to comply would be to reimburse me, including the taxes that were collected.
Until that offer’s made ,”piss off”.
Same ‘great guy’ that “Loves eminent domain”, he’s got no issue with taking the little guy’s property.
 
Back
Top Bottom