9outof10mms
Enginerding, good coffee, and factual opinions.
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
This popped up in my Google news feed. Snopes can’t just do what they claim to do—simply prove myths/legends/gossip/whatever from the internet. Instead, they take the opportunity to grandstand and give a “we hate that it’s technically wrong, but we’re gonna find bad in it anyway” answer.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ar-15-bullet-hole-size-wound/
“What’s True
The hole shown in the poster could plausibly represent the diameter of the highly destructive temporary cavity left in a person's body by a high-velocity AR-15 round.“
Right—the moonbeam idiot protesting with the idiotic sign is actually an FBI firearm forensic analyst that is talking about a complex topic of internal bullet ballistics and didn’t mean to just flat-out BS about the size of the bullet hole from a .223/5.56 projectile. Sure. I believe you. No really...I do.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ar-15-bullet-hole-size-wound/
“What’s True
The hole shown in the poster could plausibly represent the diameter of the highly destructive temporary cavity left in a person's body by a high-velocity AR-15 round.“
Right—the moonbeam idiot protesting with the idiotic sign is actually an FBI firearm forensic analyst that is talking about a complex topic of internal bullet ballistics and didn’t mean to just flat-out BS about the size of the bullet hole from a .223/5.56 projectile. Sure. I believe you. No really...I do.