Infowars removed from YouTube and others

Last edited:
Like CZ just said, what's going to happen when Twitter bans Trump for hate speech?
 
SPST said:
Yes they can. But do you want to live in a world where busniesses choose who they serve based on politics or anything else? It's like your parents taught you when you were little, don't discuss politics or religion in public.
Click to expand...
I miss the days when businesses focused on being the best in business.

These days, they're clearly and unabashedly taking political stances. Did the defeat of the wanna be queen, or more specifically to the powers behind her marionette strings, cause such derangement that the masks are coming off?

Leftist rags and blogs have been harshly shouting down that which they disagree with for over a decade. Now they're doing it publicly, and I suspect as we get closer to the midterm elections it's going to get worse.
 
Last edited:
Trump should start using other platforms to force their use. He should put speeches exclusively on a non-youtube video platform and start using gab or whatever twitter's rival is. He could wreak so much havoc if he would use the bully pulpit to hammer them. I wonder if he really understands the nuances of this battle with the marxists?
 
noway2 said:
I miss the days when businesses focused on being the best in business.

These days, they're clearly and unabashedly taking political stances. Did the defeat of the wanna be queen, or more specifically to the powers behind her marionette strings, cause such derangement that the masks are coming off?

Leftist rags and blogs have been harshly shouting down that which they disagree with for over a decade. Now they're doing it publicly, and I suspect as we get closer to the midterm elections it's going to get worse.
Click to expand...

I like it this way. No you know who your friends are when times get rough.
 
HMP said:
didnt the supreme court overrule that (yes, after the fact, but still)?
Click to expand...

So you want to rely on 9 unelected elitists?

I think the point is that the left, Dems and pretty much most of the Federal Gov are pursuing a Statist/Marxist direction with no care for the Constitution or decency. And a lot of the big corporatins, psrticularly in tech and media are all in. While I agree we shouldn't dictate what a private business does the left doesn't have decency or rules. So at some point if they are going to be defeated or held back things are going to have to get a little dirty. The right, Trump or some of us are likely going to have to compromise the 'Queen's Rules' a little.
 
premise said:
Private company is questionable when politicians control regs in your favor. I guess you will be cool when the few available ISPs in your area block access to this site.
Click to expand...

Kinda sounds like a fascist economic system huh? Freakong ignorant, phoney Antifa fools.
 
CZfool68 said:
So you want to rely on 9 unelected elitists?
Click to expand...

Im just stating the ruling was overturned. In my opinion they should have never been forced to do it in the first place. They should have declined and the potential customers moved on along like normal people.
 
HMP said:
Im just stating the ruling was overturned. In my opinion they should have never been forced to do it in the first place. They should have declined and the potential customers moved on along like normal people.
Click to expand...

Yes you are correct, but one sides demands total agreement and conformity. They won't live under those rules. You must agree with them 100% or you are a Nazi that needs to die. So what do we do? How do you combat or reason with that? That is the question, and why many people, including members here have lost patience with half measures or compromise. The left does not compromise or play by any rules. Many think it is time we do the same.
 
I checked, he's still on YouTube!


SPST said:
It's like your parents taught you when you were little, don't discuss politics or religion in public.
Click to expand...
A man of the cloth said to me, "If you can't discuss religion, politics or sex, what else is there to discuss?" :D The issue is definition of public.

HMP said:
Can private businesses not choose who they want to/will do business with?
Click to expand...
Unless you make wedding cakes, etc.
 
HMP said:
Im just stating the ruling was overturned. In my opinion they should have never been forced to do it in the first place. They should have declined and the potential customers moved on along like normal people.
Click to expand...
In that case, can I refuse blacks, gays, or Jews from a private business? Can I post a large billboard of a Hadji sodomizing a goat on my property? When government lets private businesses monopolize free speech through media, that isn't libertarianism.
 
Last edited:
premise said:
In that case, can I refuse blacks, gays, or Jews from a private business? Can I post a large billboard of a Hadji sodomizing a goat on my property? When government lets private businesses monopolize free speech through media, that isn't libertarianism.
Click to expand...

Yep, rules only apply one way right now. And at some point there is going to be a big blow back. Then again, that's what the commies are counting on. I'd bet they are shocked right now at the restraint of the deplorables.
 
Last edited:
Pink_Vapor said:
I checked, he's still on YouTube!



A man of the cloth said to me, "If you can't discuss religion, politics or sex, what else is there to discuss?" :D The issue is definition of public.


Unless you make wedding cakes, etc.
Click to expand...


I agree. IMO not discussing politics and religion with our kids is what got us here. I am not the most spiritual guy ever, but I try to engage my kids in all sorts of talks so they can think and analyze these issues. My youngest brought up the tranny thing a year or two ago and lectured us on how obvious it whether you are a boy or a girl, and how stupid the discussion is. So at least it is sinking in with her. :cool:

Target be damned!
 
Scott88 said:
It looks as if Infowars had been scrubbed from YouTube and other social media sites for "hate speech and inciting violence." I am not a fan of Infowars, but this whole "hate speech" notion seems to paint with an awfully wide brush. Who's next?
Click to expand...

James said:
Anybody that isn't a democratic socialist is most likely next
Click to expand...

noway2 said:
Have they started construction on the ministry of Truth yet?
Click to expand...
Railsplitter said:
Jones isn't the only one who got axed by social media sites - just to name a few:

> Tommy Robinson got banned from instagram today (he was banned from twitter back in March).
> Candace Owens had her twitter account suspended.
> A Democatic senator from MA called for more conservative websites to be taken down yesterday.

I wonder when we're gonna start seeing the book burnings? LOL
Click to expand...


There is nothing wrong with your television.
Do not attempt to adjust the picture.
We are now in control of the transmission.
We control the horizontal and the vertical.
We can deluge you with a thousands channels, or expand one single image to crystal clarity and beyond.
We can shape your vision to anything our imagination can conceive.
We will control all that you see and hear.

 
HMP said:
didnt the supreme court overrule that (yes, after the fact, but still)?
Click to expand...

Although SCOTUS ruled in favor of the baker in this case, the overall ruling was anything but a slam dunk win for the 1st amendment. This ruling was more of an admonition of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and totally left the door open for future BS lawsuits of the same type.
 
Railsplitter said:
Although SCOTUS ruled in favor of the baker in this case, the overall ruling was anything but a slam dunk win for the 1st amendment. This ruling was more of an admonition of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and totally left the door open for future BS lawsuits of the same type.
Click to expand...
I can’t recall a time in many years where that stupid court has done anything but make a minuscule narrow decision. However, many of these sorts of things should be decided by legislatures not courts,
 
CZfool68 said:
Yep, rules only apply one way right now. And at some point there is going to be a big blow back. Then again, that's what the commies are counting on. I'd bet they are shocked right now at the restraint of the deplorables.
Click to expand...
Not sure it's what they are counting on. It's what they fear. Because if that blowback comes, it will not be in the form of libertarianism sweeping the country and letting everyone live as they wish.
 
drypowder said:
Not sure it's what they are counting on. It's what they fear. Because if that blowback comes, it will not be in the form of libertarianism sweeping the country and letting everyone live as they wish.
Click to expand...

I'd say they want a couple Bubba's to shoot something up so they can cry about guns and violent fascist Trump supporters. And I would even guess Ryan and McConnell would go right along with a new gun law or crack down on right wing web sites, or some such crap. The Marxist Dems know that Republicans always cave to Statist leanings.
 
premise said:
In that case, can I refuse blacks, gays, or Jews from a private business? Can I post a large billboard of a Hadji sodomizing a goat on my property? When government lets private businesses monopolize free speech through media, that isn't libertarianism.
Click to expand...
I wish you could, I wish everyone could operate their businesses exactly how they prefer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom