Kyle Rittenhouse going back to court

Radar

Radar

Senior Member
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
6,143
Location
Eastern NC
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
A Federal judge in Wisconsin is allowing a civil trial to continue in a wrongful death suit brought by Anthony Huber’s family against Kenosha police, Kyle Rittenhouse and others to proceed. Huber was the skateboard guy that assaulted Kyle before he defended himself.

www.foxnews.com

Wisconsin federal judge rules wrongful death lawsuit against Kyle Rittenhouse can proceed

A federal judge in Wisconsin ruled Wednesday that a wrongful death lawsuit, filed by the father of Anthony Huber, the man shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse, may proceed.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
Last edited:
In allowing the case against Rittenhouse and the others to proceed, the judge said that Huber's death "could plausibly be regarded as having been proximately caused by the actions of the governmental defendants."

So, is this about Kyle or the City?


Anthony Huber's father, John Huber, also alleged that Rittenhouse, who was 17 at the time of the shootings, conspired with law enforcement to cause harm to protestors.

That's a stretch.
 
That “judge” should have their black fag robes shoved down their throat and their gavel shoved up their backside and used as a steering rod while theyre marched through the streets on their hands and knees.

Give them some “judgment” and make them learn what little they’re worth.
 
georgel said:
In allowing the case against Rittenhouse and the others to proceed, the judge said that Huber's death "could plausibly be regarded as having been proximately caused by the actions of the governmental defendants."

So, is this about Kyle or the City?


Anthony Huber's father, John Huber, also alleged that Rittenhouse, who was 17 at the time of the shootings, conspired with law enforcement to cause harm to protestors.

That's a stretch.
Click to expand...

That’s not a stretch, that’s full on liberal bullchit..
Blame everyone else...
 
Lower standard of proof in civil court and judges just love to give everyone their day in court. I was once sued because one party alleged that they had a contract with another party, that the second party broke it, and that he broke it because I hired him. There was no contract, the allegation was entirely fabricated. Couldn’t get it tossed.
 
This sort of thing needs to be treated like a winner take all prize fight. In other words the losing side pays. As it stands now 3 parties are going to win. The lawyer for the winner, the winner and the lawyer for the loser. So it is a win-win for the lawyers. They need to have some skin in the game. Then the game will change.



On a side note. Rittenhouse should counter sue for them raising and idiot who went into a gunfight with a skate board.


I am on a roll today. Let's change it so the lawyer for the losing side has to pay the lawyer for the winning side so the winner gets all they should get.
 
Last edited:
Schattenreiter said:
I am on a roll today. Let's change it so the lawyer for the losing side has to pay the lawyer for the winning side so the winner gets all they should get.
Click to expand...
That is the only way to address the issue of bringing frivolous civil lawsuits. Change it to lawyers only bringing lawsuits they think they can win.
 
John Huber,

You sir, are a POS loser, the apple fell right at the base of the tree.

Your sorry offspring attempted murder, and his victim that was on the ground, stopped him in his tracks. He got what he asked for, so you think you deserve a pay day?!?

If anything, you should have to pay for the damage of your little turd for the rest of your sorry entitled life.
 
If I were a bettin' man, I'd put up a shiny new dime that Huber didn't decide to sue and find that attorney all by hisself.

I doubt there are many layers of the lawsuit onion between "O! Th' Grieving Fatha!", an Idea Called Antifa, and the D Part-ay Politburo.

But then, I've become somethingt of a skeptic in my dotage...
 
georgel said:
In allowing the case against Rittenhouse and the others to proceed, the judge said that Huber's death "could plausibly be regarded as having been proximately caused by the actions of the governmental defendants."

So, is this about Kyle or the City?
Click to expand...
You don't have much experience with lawyers do you ;) ?

Yes, this is about THE CITY, cause that is where the money is. Kyle is just a prop, here.
 
Last edited:
The lawsuit, which names Rittenhouse, police officers and others ad defendants, accuses officers of allowing for a dangerous situation that violated his son's constitutional rights and resulted in his death.

I mean I guess it's technically true, officers didn't do much to stop the mass rioting in the city which led to skater bro getting killed. If you really want to trace back the blame it starts with Jacob Blake when he went for a knife to stab a cop, but hey what do I know?
 
Ferrisfan said:
That is the only way to address the issue of bringing frivolous civil lawsuits. Change it to lawyers only bringing lawsuits they think they can win.
Click to expand...
There are many states, including NC, where the charging party are assessed legal fees of the defending party. The problem is that federal courts have no such provisions, so attorneys will go thru amazing hoops to bring cases to federal courts. The legal system in the USA is the most corrupt, convoluted, twisted, and byzantine structure imaginable. I am not even a lawyer and I know it. I cannot imagine how jaded, burned out, and dispirited it must make a young da or aspiring champion of justice who enters that profession. I have never met a cop who has any experience working with these people who has anything but disdain in general for them, and I am no fan of cops as an institution, either. The whole thing is rotten.


EDIT: Heh, after typing that jeremiad, the thought entered my head "well, what about Daniel? You really think the courts/legal system in Babylon were models of decorum, justice, integrity, uprightness and not cesspools of avarice, revenge, greed and personal acquisition?" Reminds me that wherever I am, my goal cannot be to reform the structures. Too big a job for me. If I can reform ME and try to act like I wish everyone would act, that is the only "win" that is likely to go down in my column. Don't expect integrity in a world full of liars and thieves, and don't pump your own integrity, Eddie. If it is real, people will see it and notice.

I am all the time trying to play with the pros, when my proper place is in the Pop Warner leagues. Hard for me to remember, but it brings peace when I can.

Yes, the legal system is gamed for the legal professionals. It is what you expect in a corrupt society.
 
Last edited:
Schattenreiter said:
This sort of thing needs to be treated like a winner take all prize fight. In other words the losing side pays. As it stands now 3 parties are going to win. The lawyer for the winner, the winner and the lawyer for the loser. So it is a win-win for the lawyers. They need to have some skin in the game. Then the game will change.



On a side note. Rittenhouse should counter sue for them raising and idiot who went into a gunfight with a skate board.


I am on a roll today. Let's change it so the lawyer for the losing side has to pay the lawyer for the winning side so the winner gets all they should get.
Click to expand...
Let's just throw the lawyers in Thunderdome.
 
BlackGun said:
Most people who become lawyers are democrats. Most judges therefore are democrats, with liberal views.
Click to expand...
Interesting

If I were going to stereotype lawyers I would have thought more republican voting

Rich, white, male and don’t want to pay taxes…

Is there data on this? Not arguing, I have no idea! I just literally would have had the opposite assumption
 
georgel said:
In allowing the case against Rittenhouse and the others to proceed, the judge said that Huber's death "could plausibly be regarded as having been proximately caused by the actions of the governmental defendants."

So, is this about Kyle or the City?


Anthony Huber's father, John Huber, also alleged that Rittenhouse, who was 17 at the time of the shootings, conspired with law enforcement to cause harm to protestors.

That's a stretch.
Click to expand...
More like, That criminals death should plausibly be regarded as being proximately caused by the actions of being a rioter, looter, arsonist POS while trying to assault and kill a kid with a weapon while you are rioting.
 
vp9c said:
Rich, white, male and don’t want to pay taxes…
Click to expand...
What in God's name gave you the idea that this group of people are predominately "Republican?"... I mean, BESIDES Bernie Sanders rhetoric?
The truth is almost diametrically opposite of that. The wealthy are almost overwhelmingly democrat today.
 
Apropos of nothing, I managed a dozen commercial properties for about a decade. Only had to kick out two tenants in that time.

Both lawyers.
 
Last edited:
tanstaafl72555 said:
What in God's name gave you the idea that this group of people are predominately "Republican?"... I mean, BESIDES Bernie Sanders rhetoric?
The truth is almost diametrically opposite of that. The wealthy are almost overwhelmingly democrat today.
Click to expand...
The key words in my post were

Stereotype

No idea

And assumption

I’d still like to see the data
 
Last edited:
The initial standard for a plaintiff to show standing to sue, the court's jurisdiction over the case and stating a claim upon which relief can be granted is very low. All this really means is that the pleadings are in order and the plaintiff has set out alleged 'facts' that (if true) are sufficient entitle him to damages. The parties will now do discovery, and once all the evidence is known, the judge will then decide if there are any genuine issues of material fact and allow the case to be tried before a jury; or if the claim is barred by some established fact or evidence; or that the evidence is such that even if taken as true in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the plaintiff still could not prevail under existing law. This is just the first of four procedural points where the defendants' attorneys can ask the court to throw out the lawsuit.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom