I watched the review and have been following the continuing problems he's posting on Instagram. For those of you without 30 min to kill watching it, the short version is "it doesn't work". Some of it could be that particular gun, and some of it is due to bad design (parts flexing that will never actually work).
You can pick up a full sized 9mm from almost anyone and have it work perfectly out of the box. "bad guns" usually fall into the pocket category where things are as small as possible, but we're not talking pocket 380s here.
Why would Remington release a product with such glaring flaws into a highly competitive market? Are there enough people that go "oohh... a Remington!" and just buy it and not expect it to work 100% as a pistol? Or say "It works 75% of the time but I'm saving money vs. buying a glock/sig/hk/ruger/S&W/kahr/taraus!"?
Did they make enough money on the R51 to try to rush something else to market?
You can pick up a full sized 9mm from almost anyone and have it work perfectly out of the box. "bad guns" usually fall into the pocket category where things are as small as possible, but we're not talking pocket 380s here.
Why would Remington release a product with such glaring flaws into a highly competitive market? Are there enough people that go "oohh... a Remington!" and just buy it and not expect it to work 100% as a pistol? Or say "It works 75% of the time but I'm saving money vs. buying a glock/sig/hk/ruger/S&W/kahr/taraus!"?
Did they make enough money on the R51 to try to rush something else to market?