Roberts Sides with Liberals in Pennsylvania Vote-by-Mail Battle

YeeHaa

Member
Charter Life Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2016
Messages
6,791
Location
T'ville ~ Trinity
Rating - 100%
8   0   0
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a Republican application to stay the decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to grant the Democratic Party’s request to make several changes to mail-in voting that critics have decried as vulnerable to fraud.

As Breitbart News reported last month, “The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled … that ballots received three days after Election Day will still be counted — even if there is no evidence they were postmarked on time.”

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elec...hanges-4-4-split-roberts-sides-with-liberals/



From the comments:


Wait till the Epstein Logs and info gets released. Roberts days are numbered.


This guy Roberts is not a conservative jurist. This dissent is not an interpretation of the law; it's an application of leftist politics. There is not ONE reason why the LAW and the CONSTITUTION as it is written would allow such a ruling. ACB is the anecdote to this disease - first the Obamacare ruling that it's a "tax" and now this. He's a traitor to the bench and the judicial branch.
 
Roberts nominated by Bush Jr. is turning into David Souter (retired) who was nominated by Bush Sr.
 
He adopted two little girls from Ireland. It is illegal for non-Irish citizens to adopt Irish orphans. Little boys? He sure looks guilty of something. His "tax" logic is bizarre. Now he's protected Deep State asset.
 
I read somewhere in the old days people believed the three branches of government truly were separate and independent. The Supreme Court could make a ruling and the Executive branch could respond, "Well, y'all got a right to your opinion, but we don't see it that way and that farmer can feed his home grown corn to his own cows in this own damn state until they turn into steak and he eats 'em. Call it Interstate Commerce all ya want to. We're on his side!"
 
Back
Top Bottom