The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a Republican application to stay the decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to grant the Democratic Party’s request to make several changes to mail-in voting that critics have decried as vulnerable to fraud.
As Breitbart News reported last month, “The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled … that ballots received three days after Election Day will still be counted — even if there is no evidence they were postmarked on time.”
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elec...hanges-4-4-split-roberts-sides-with-liberals/
From the comments:
Wait till the Epstein Logs and info gets released. Roberts days are numbered.
This guy Roberts is not a conservative jurist. This dissent is not an interpretation of the law; it's an application of leftist politics. There is not ONE reason why the LAW and the CONSTITUTION as it is written would allow such a ruling. ACB is the anecdote to this disease - first the Obamacare ruling that it's a "tax" and now this. He's a traitor to the bench and the judicial branch.
As Breitbart News reported last month, “The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled … that ballots received three days after Election Day will still be counted — even if there is no evidence they were postmarked on time.”
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elec...hanges-4-4-split-roberts-sides-with-liberals/
From the comments:
Wait till the Epstein Logs and info gets released. Roberts days are numbered.
This guy Roberts is not a conservative jurist. This dissent is not an interpretation of the law; it's an application of leftist politics. There is not ONE reason why the LAW and the CONSTITUTION as it is written would allow such a ruling. ACB is the anecdote to this disease - first the Obamacare ruling that it's a "tax" and now this. He's a traitor to the bench and the judicial branch.