Intro To Night Vision

Studentofthegun

From the Land of White Pine and Moonshine
Staff member
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
Joined
Dec 16, 2016
Messages
3,647
Location
Central NC
Been getting a lot of private messages asking about the best deal going on Night Vision right now. I'll edit this post to make a guide as best I can, with the understanding that I don't have all the answers and am in learning mode as well.

Right now there is a ton of interest in night vision and as such, prices are going up. But if you want a good white phosphor tube at a reasonable price with good specs, I recommend the Photonis ECHO spec. Also recommend that if you're looking to get it in a short timeframe (2-4 weeks), get it from JRH.


Buyer's Guide

If you want to read a really great thread about night vision and thermal, there is a huge one on AR15.com that has tons of information. Lots of pictures and so forth. It's a lot to dig through but worth it. There's also a Night Vision subform there that is excellent for technical info. There is also a buyers guide on the Night Vision Forum there.

OMG Night Vision Thread:

Night Vision Forum:

HOW DOES A NIGHT VISION MONOCLE WORK?

Here's a diagram.

How-Do-Infrared-Night-Vision-Goggles-Work.png

1. Dim light comes in the front of the device (even if it appears dark to you, there is still some light out there).
2. Light particles, known as photons, hit the surface of the photocathode. It takes the photons and makes them into electrons.
3. The electrons then move into the photomultiplier. Those electrons crash into other electrons. Think of it like you're playing pool. You hit the cue ball to break and it strikes the other balls sending them in all directions. In this manner, the number of electrons we have moving around now has been increased.
4. There is a screen that all the electrons hit. When they hit the screen, it produces small sparks of light. Thus, the amount of light that went into the tube is amplified at the sub atomic level and projected via the screen in the night vision device.

So now we know roughly how it works. Now we need to be able to shop for a unit. You'll probably find the devices listed two primary ways:

1. The vendor lists a specific device. The one you see is the one you'll get. They will often share the specs for that particular device.
2. You can order the device but you don't know which exact one you're going to get. Instead, the vendor will list guaranteed minimum specifications. So you know your device is going to be better than the minimums but you won't know exactly how much.

For example, you might see this:

"Typical specifications P-45 WHITE PHOSPHOR tube, MIN FOM 1800, MIN RES: 62, SPOT SPEC: 1/0 - 2/1 - 3/2/1 Operating hours: 10,000+"

So what do all of those things mean? I have the quick and dirty explanations below but for more details I recommend going to:

Green Phosphor vs. White Phosphor

I've seen both and can tell you that I personally prefer white phosphor. However, I've also looked through some really sharp green tubes. Some people believe that the white phosphor has less eye fatigue. I would be quite happy with green so long as the specs are good.

Examples of green vs white:

white versus green 1.png
white v g 2.jpg


Figure of Merit (FOM)
FOM is calculated by multiplying the line pairs per millimeter by the signal to noise ratio. In other words, FOM = Resolution x SNR. FOM is a quick way to measure how well the image intensifier (or tube) performs. That's not to say it is the only metric you want to worry about, but it is a key one. I would recommend a FOM of 2000 or greater if possible. I would not go below 1800.

Signal to noise ratio (SNR)
This measures how the photocathode performs, which based on how the image intensifier works, is probably the most important measure of performance. It measures how well the dim light particles are parsed out from the "noise" (other factors that would excite the electrons). I would not go below 26 for the SNR. Anything about 30 or greater is really good.

Halo
This is the halo effect that you see around lights. I'm getting older so I already experience that with oncoming traffic when driving at night. The halo causes the light source to "bloom" making it harder to see detail about that object. That applies if it is a light on the side of a building, a flashlight someone is using in the distance, or even the moon.

Luminance gain
This measures the level of light amplification the tube can produce when the gain is turned all the way up. Each device should have a gain knob that allows you to increase or decrease the gain. When you turn the gain up, you will get what I call speckles. Looks a bit like a sparkling effect, but when you turn it up, the tube becomes more sensitive and will increase the amount of light being sent to your eye. Turn it down and you'll see less sparkles but also a dimmer image. My spec sheet doesn't say luminance. It just says "gain" and the numbers are apparently measured a little differently that "luminance".

Resolution (or Limiting Resolution at the Center)
This one is pretty self explanatory. Measures level of detail and the sharpness of the image being rendered via the screen.
Recommend a resolution at center of 62 lp/mm or greater.

Spots and Blemishes
Spots: All night vision tubes have spots and it is simply part of the result of the process used to manufacture intensifier tubes. The important considerations about the spots are location and size. The size is the diameter, so that's pretty straight forward. One could probably tolerate a larger spot so long as it isn't in the middle of the screen. To describe the location the spot(s) appear in the tube, manufacturers use zones.

Spot comparison.png

What you can see above is how the zones are laid out. Zone 1 is in the center, Zone 2 in the middle, and Zone 3 is the perimeter. Also, you can see from the illustration that there are spots of different sizes. If you have a large spot right smack in the middle of Zone 1, that could be no bueno. But spots are relatively small and don't typically render the tube unusable.

Blems, on the other hand, are different from spots. A blem could occur as a "laser burn", where a laser has been shined at the tube and ruined part of the tube. It's really bad when that happens in Zone 1, like this image:

blem.jpg

So if you are shopping for a tube on the intarwebz, make sure you have some sort of picture of what the tube actually looks like in the dark. See if you can also get the spec sheet, or at least a list of the specs. This is why I think it can be risky to buy used night vision off Facebook from an individual. You can get some great deals that way but you must know what you're getting.

Dual Tubes vs. Monocles

For the most part, this will likely be dictated by your budget. Dual tubes, or binoculars, are super cool but also more expensive. There are different options such as binos, dual tubes, ruggedized, etc. The next step up from a single tube is ruggedized night vision. You'll have two tube of course, but their movement options are limited.

Ruggedized has a bridge that is more or less fixed. Dual night vision is reticulating. You can move the tubes independently of one another. This comes in handy if you're wearing your nods and want to flip just one tube out of the way to aim a rifle equipped with a thermal scope.


R v D.png

While waiting for my monocle to show up, I was a little bit disenfranchised by some of the people saying that one should skip having a monocle and save up for dual tubes. On the one hand, I get it. When I got mine, I went and visited a buddy of mine who also had a white phosphor tube. I held a tube up to each eye...and it was amazing. As soon as I could, I placed an order for dual tubes. Do I regret having a monocle? No, because it has taught me a bit about equipment and what it will and won't do.

Also, I will be keeping my monocle. I learned something really important just standing on the back porch letting my buddies check out my gear. If you have the best equipment under the sun, it is less fun if you can only enjoy it by yourself. It's a lot more fun if your buddy can also see in the dark. It doesn't hurt to have an extra tube. Imagine how cool it would be if you went out of town and were able to throw your extra tube and a skull crusher (which is a soft head mount) in your bug out bag. Talk about being able to get home a lot safer. What if there is a natural disaster like Katrina? Recall those stories about people cowering in their homes when it was pitch black and the looters were moving through the neighborhoods? If you're defending your home and loved ones, it is nice to be able to hand a setup to someone so they can watch your back. These devices have very narrow fields of view. Two sets of night eyes are better than one.

There are some self-described prepper experts out there that claim that night vision is one of the most important prep items you need to acquire. Opinions vary on this, but it is true that being able to see in the dark is a huge advantage. Night vision monocles are good for lots of different things. Whether it is heading into the deer stand at 4:30am or simply stargazing, a night vision monocle is a really great thing to have. It is a shame that many people buy them and they just sit in a closet. I've seen some folks attach them to telescopes with amazing results.

Note: NEVER use rechargeable batteries with a night vision monocle. I'm not certain why this is, but it is not good for the device. Some have reported batteries rupturing and the acid ate through the plastic housing and messed up the tube. They take AA batteries so just buy a bunch of good quality ones and don't fret about it. Each battery can power a monocle for 40+ hours.

[ Placeholder for future writeup ]
 
Last edited:
That, sir, is an excellent write-up in one place for info that one normally has to feel one's way around to learn.
It is a work in progress for sure. Once I get into lasers and light and stuff...sigh....might have bitten off more than I can chew. But I’m gonna give it a go anyway.
 
If you want to read some information about delivery times and customer satisfaction regarding all sorts of vendors, this is a really good thread on Arfcom:


I also recommend joining some of the online Facebook groups. Tons of good information there. Really interesting to see how the vendors deal with customer feedback and so forth. Plus I learn something almost every day just from the random stuff that pops up on my feed from all those groups.
 
[ Placeholder for future post ]
 
Aftermarket filters are now available and they are pretty cool. What they allow you to do is place this colored filter on a green phosphor lens and it will appear to be a different color. Up until about a week or so ago, the fellow selling these filters did not have a web page. You had to message him on Facebook and send him funds electronically. The filters are so popular though he ended up needing a website. I've purchased two filters from him as gifts for other people, but because of USPS shenanigans I ended up with three filters.


He used to have blue filters but apparently doesn't sell them currently. He now only sells white, amber, and clear. The clear ones are really just for protection.

The pictures below show what a green phosphor tube looks like with the filters installed. First two are the white filter and the third one is amber. I think the white filters are really impressive. Keep in mind that any time you add a filter you're cutting down a tiny amount of light that gets to your eye. A lot of people feel it is worth it and I would agree.

One word of caution, make sure your housing is the correct diameter or the filter won't fit.

white filter 1.jpg

white filter 2.jpg
amber filter.jpg
 
Aftermarket filters are now available and they are pretty cool. What they allow you to do is place this colored filter on a green phosphor lens and it will appear to be a different color. Up until about a week or so ago, the fellow selling these filters did not have a web page. You had to message him on Facebook and send him funds electronically. The filters are so popular though he ended up needing a website. I've purchased two filters from him as gifts for other people, but because of USPS shenanigans I ended up with three filters.


He used to have blue filters but apparently doesn't sell them currently. He now only sells white, amber, and clear. The clear ones are really just for protection.

The pictures below show what a green phosphor tube looks like with the filters installed. First two are the white filter and the third one is amber. I think the white filters are really impressive. Keep in mind that any time you add a filter you're cutting down a tiny amount of light that gets to your eye. A lot of people feel it is worth it and I would agree.

View attachment 305855

View attachment 305856
View attachment 305854
Thanks for posting this...I just ordered one of the white filters to try out on my 14's.
 
Last edited:
IR Lasers and Illuminators

Once you've got some sort of night vision monocle or duals, you will likely need some sort of Infrared laser and Infrared illuminator. There are many different paths you can take. There are some options that won't break the bank while others are extremely expensive (to me anyway). What these devices do is project an infrared beam that cannot be seem by the naked eye. However, you can see it with your night vision device. This gives you the ability to aim in the dark. Also, you can get an IR illuminator which acts like a weapon light. It allows you to identify objects in the dark. Using these things in tandem gives you the ability to defend hearth and home from alien invasion, coyotes, etc. in the dark.

Here is what it might look like.

1614357374917.png

As you can see, there's a laser and around that you can see the bloom of the illuminator. Some people will have separate units for the purpose. They'll have an illuminator that operates off of one pressure switch. They'll also have a separate unit that is the laser, operating off another switch. Some people opt to get the units that contain both features. Those units have different settings so you can use the illuminator by itself, the laser by itself, or both simultaneously. Most people also run a white (visible) light on their rifle as well. Needless to say, your setup regarding your switches is pretty important to figure out. You'll also sometimes have to manage all of your wires, which can be tricky. Doesn't have to be complicated or expensive to manage your wires. Most people just use zip ties.

Because of U.S. laws pertaining to laser power limitations, it can be a little difficult getting a full power laser. For example, a military version of the PEQ is 30 mW (milliwatts). The civilian version has a maximum of 0.7 mW. That's a huge difference in intensity. There is some danger inherent with the really powerful lasers. If shined in your eye, they could cause permanent damage. Even blindness. This is no joke. A fellow once posted on another gun forum that he completely lost the sight in one eye due to an accident with a Russian PERST laser. Consider that when it is operating in IR mode, you can't even see the laser. This is something you'll want to watch out for.

I'll start with combined units, but quite frankly, I'm not sure they are the answer for everyone. I've got one, but I'm not so sure I shouldn't have gotten a laser and illuminator as separate units. It would have been a lot cheaper.

The best of the best for the combined unites is the MAWL, but it runs about $2700. It has both an IR laser and a powerful IR Illuminator.

1614356909084.png

If you can find a military version of the PEQ for sale that is a great option. There are many that are legal to sell and one shouldn’t assume they have all been pilfered from the military. There are civilian options that have really great illuminators. The Steiner DBAL 2 is a great example.

There is a great writeup at this link from Recoil. I recall the issues with one of their editors but I think they canned the guy so I guess I can link to them.

The picture below shows several different units and as you can see, it makes a difference which one you choose.

MG_IR_01.jpg

Another option is to pick a laser and then buy a separate illuminator. You could get, for example, an OTAL-C:

1614374244877.png
And then get a Modlite illuminator, for example:

1614374340964.png

That could be a less expensive path to victory. Many people have chosen the PERST lasers and illuminator made by Zenitco, a Russian company. Even though you can't buy a full power laser, for the most part, from a US company, you can easily get a Russian lightsaber, er I mean laser, from eBay, Ivan Tactical, Russian Thunder, etc. I've seen them in action and they are impressive. Warrantly work, as you can imagine, can be tricky. Takes a few weeks to get because some sort of bribery is involved for Russian customs. But there's no denying that they are powerful lasers and the price is hard to beat. Everyone will have to be okay with their own measure of risks because no matter which way you go, there will be tradeoffs. Either based on price or functionality, it's going to be there.

Here is an example of the PERST. Keep in mind there are several models, but you can get a full power laser (for aiming) for less than $500.
1614376928318.png

If you take the path of having separate units for IR lights and IR lasers, you'll also probably want to find a switch that allows you to active these lights. That's where some of these two button switches come into play:


products-TAPS_af.jpg

Disclaimer: I don't know how well these buttons play with Russian equipment.

Or the Streamlight one (which is a whole lot cheaper):
1614375287159.png


But what if I have a two button switch where one is controlling the laser and the other is controlling the IR illuminator? What do I do when I want to add a white light and still be able to control it via a pressure switch? The answer is to get yet another button. You can get a third switch by adding a Unity Tactical Hot Button.

1614374679954.png

Imagine you've got:

- Your laser mounted on the top rail (12 o'clock)
- Your illuminator mounted at 3 o'clock
- Your flashlight mounted at 4:30 using an offset mount like a Haley Strategic Thorntail or an Arisaka offset mount.
- Your two button switch mounted at 12 o'clock on your top rail.
- Your hot button mounted behind your laser but in front of your two button switch.

Here is how that setup might look. Sort of. I couldn't easily find a picture that shows exactly what I want. You get the idea, hopefully.

1614375586647.png
 
Last edited:
Wire Management

Ok, so now you got all this crap on your rifle and now you need to manage all those wires. Imagine the embarrassment you'd feel if you were eaten by a zombie hoard because your wires got hung on something. Wire management can be pretty important. Plus, you want to look cool, right?

1614376127494.png

There are several ways to do this. The first is via zip ties threaded through the rail.

1614376207668.png

Pretty nice writeup on this from Pew Pew Tactical. And of course YouTube. Always check out YouTube for this kind of stuff.

Another way is to use a Cloud Defense button mount.

1614375873946.png

This allows you to thread the wire under the mount to keep it out of the way. Yet another option, which I am personally exploring, is the wire management options from Arson Machine.

1614375982366.png
1614376012976.png
1614375965142.png

I am inclined to use both the Arson Machine and Cloud Defense solutions so that I don't have to rely on the adhesive or zip ties to secure the two button switch itself. Once I get it all figured out, I'll post some pictures.

{Work in Progress}
 
Pistol Lazers, Beamz, and stuff

One of the best options, in my opinion, for a pistol laser/illuminator is the Streamlight VIR II. It is my preferred option because it has a three position switch for OFF/IR/White Light. When you choose IR, you get not only an IR laser but also an IR illuminator. This is a great option for a pistol and probably an all around desirable setup for CQB in a house. The big illuminators are often so powerful, you get a lot of "bloom". They can be more intensity than you need and sort of wash out your aiming laser. The VIR II won't do that.

1614399370311.png

1614399381184.png


Other options include the Steiner Mini Tor. I wish the Mini Tor had a provision to accept a plug so that you could add a pressure switch. It appears the only way to activate it is to use the pressure pads on each side of the unit.

1614398717094.png

Olight has recently got into the IR game with the Baldr IR. Unlike the Streamlight, it does not have an IR illuminator. Instead, it just has a white light and an IR laser beam.

1614398854410.png

Suspect that even an inexpensive light on a suppressed .22 would be loads of fun when hunting small varmints.
 
I got one of the Photonis Echo WP's in a Vyper housing in a group buy on another site in January...

Gotta say that tube is flat sick...

1600 FOM and if there's a flaw in the tube anywhere, I challenge anyone to find it.

Figuring out what I needed to rig it was a bit of a challenge, but wound up with the Crye Nightcap, a Cadex mount, the J arm that came with the unit and Norotos shroud. Should be good for year-round wear.

It absolutely rocks...

Thanks for the write-up, this will help a lot of new buyers! I do recommend that if you are getting into this game, do yourself a favor buy new from a reputable supplier. There's a minor boat-ton of sketch rebuilt gear out there.

buy once, cry once...
 
The B.E. Meyers MAWL may be the dead sexy overpriced call girl of the U.S.-made illuminator/designator world, but to paraphrase one review that made me chuckle, the Perst3 is that dirty, behind-the-dumpster kind of nasty Russian hooker whose sex appeal and price point are hard to deny in the combined illuminator/designator world.

I found the reference to the story about eye damage very worthwhile, as it's one of those Internet ghost stories that no one except the original poster can really confirm as true or false -- but there's a lesson in it, nonetheless. If the one I read is the same as the one Studentofthegun was referring to, it wasn't a full power Perst3 that was the culprit, it was a full power ATPIAL. (Here's the story I read, for reference...)

For what it's worth to those who might want to protect their eyes from potential mishaps with full power lasers:
Revision has additional Laserbloc lenses for its Stingerhawk eyewear to protect against different wavelengths should users desire them. Some digging around on the Oakley's Laser Toric lens was required to get the specific laser protections for it; Oakley isn't very forthcoming with that for whatever reason. Surplus BLPS glasses found on ebay do not provide protections in the 820-850nm spectrum based on what I could find about them when researching eye protection to go with my full power Perst3.

I would caution individuals to be wary of inexpensive eye protection in this (full power laser) arena. We each only have one pair of eyes, at most. Do we really want to place them under the protection of $15.00 Chinesium knock-offs? This is one place where I feel it pays (and is worth paying for) to know EXACTLY what you are buying and from whom...
 
Last edited:
The B.E. Meyers MAWL may be the dead sexy overpriced call girl of the U.S.-made illuminator/designator world, but to paraphrase one review that made me chuckle, the Perst3 is that dirty, behind-the-dumpster kind of nasty Russian hooker whose sex appeal and price point are hard to deny in the combined illuminator/designator world.

I found the reference to the story about eye damage very worthwhile, as it's one of those Internet ghost stories that no one except the original poster can really confirm as true or false -- but there's a lesson in it, nonetheless. If the one I read is the same as the one Studentofthegun was referring to, it wasn't a full power Perst3 that was the culprit, it was a full power ATPIAL. (Here's the story I read, for reference...)

For what it's worth to those who might want to protect their eyes from potential mishaps with full power lasers:
Revision has additional Laserbloc lenses for its Stingerhawk eyewear to protect against different wavelengths should users desire them. Some digging around on the Oakley's Laser Toric lens was required to get the specific laser protections for it; Oakley isn't very forthcoming with that for whatever reason. Surplus BLPS glasses found on ebay do not provide protections in the 820-850nm spectrum based on what I could find about them when researching eye protection to go with my full power Perst3.

I would caution individuals to be wary of inexpensive eye protection in this (full power laser) arena. We each only have one pair of eyes, at most. Do we really want to place them under the protection of $15.00 Chinesium knock-offs? This is one place where I feel it pays (and is worth paying for) to know EXACTLY what you are buying and from whom...

In your research did you find anything that could be done for the poor saps like me that require a prescription set of lenses? That’s my next purchase.
 
In your research did you find anything that could be done for the poor saps like me that require a prescription set of lenses? That’s my next purchase.
I ran across this when buying my Revision Stingerhawk eyepro. It looks like it clips onto the nosepiece and is used to hold prescription lenses behind whatever Revision ballistic lens one elects to use: Revision Prescription (RX) Carrier and Connector System

I believe you would then have to work with your optometrist to have prescription lenses crafted to fit the carrier... unless you need only single vision correction (i.e. you don't need bifocals, progressives, etc.) in which case you can order polycarbonate lenses at additional cost direct from Revision using this form.

Surreal

P.S. I wear glasses, as well. However, my prescription has changed a lot in a very short period ... and I need to let it settle before I contemplate additional spend on the RX carrier.
 
Last edited:
Anybody got a good review of a universal bridge? In other words, the bridge to pair two PVS-14s together?
 
My Perst4 (laser only, no illumination) is freaking incredible. Easily visible in daylight out to 500yds
 
@surrealone, am I correct in assuming the GI-19 lens is the appropriate choice for protection against the laser pointers/designators were talking about here?

GI-19 Lens
The GI-19 lens simply protects against more wavelengths than the E2-5 lens ... with increased optical density ... and a decrease in visible light transmission. Which lens is right for a particular user/wearer is a matter of preference and/or need (aka use case).

Here's a table that may help with Revision lens selection:
revision_table.png

As an example when it comes to lens selection - as the Perst3 is an 850nm device, I chose the E2-5 as it's adequate to the task of providing protection from the Perst3 should I inadvertently do something stupid (so long as I have on the protective eyewear, of course). The GI-19 would have worked fine, too, but it was $20 more for protection I didn't require from this device, and it allows a lot less visible light through that lens -- meaning everything will appear darker, theoretically making it the GI-19 harder to use in low-light or no-light situations given the scotopic value is ~7 times worse than that of the E2-5 lens.

Interestingly, the military considers one's night vision devices to be one's protection when they are worn and a direct hit is taken from a full power laser. Certainly this damages the intensifier tube(s), but one's eye(s) is/are still spared/saved. Now, if I were around others with full power lasers and unfamiliar with their gear (like, say, an instructor who teaches night vision courses might be), and if I would NOT be wearing night vision gear at the time, then the GI-19 kit would be my purchase choice, instead -- just for the increased spectrum protection.

I hope that helps.

Surreal

P.S. If you want protection against RGB lasers like those used by protestors in Portland and BLM movements in 2020, the FT-2 lens is what a number of people used according to posts I read on ARFCOM. However, if you're willing to trade visibility to have one lens that covers a wider range of spectrum rather than selecting mission-specific lenses for each need, then the GI-19 is probably your go-to if you're trying to cover non-visible IR in the 800-900nm range in addition to the RGB lasers used in protests.
 
Last edited:
Thanks @surrealone, that does explain it well.

Back in the day, one of my core tasks was designating targets with Laser Target Designators (SOFLAM, PEQ-1, etc.). These were the days of laser-guided bombs (think Desert Storm era technology).

There was little/no training and/or safety precautions to protect against eye damage in the early days, in fact, I have many ex-teammates that have documented laser damage to their eyes. I’ve sometimes thought I might have a couple of blind spots but never had them checked because going to see the doc is generally a bad thing on active duty.

About mid-90’s we started getting issued what I remember being called BLIPS or something like that. They were basically Gargoyles shaped sunglasses, about the color of those GI-19 lenses. There was also a secondary, clip-on lens in the set that had a mirrored, green-fly color to it. I think I still have a couple sets of these squirreled away somewhere : )

Never any training or explanation, just “here you go”...

Technology has progressed but maybe more importantly, access to information has advanced to the point that we can educate ourselves on the net.

Thanks for the info!


Anybody remember what “1688” refers to?
 
Last edited:
About mid-90’s we started getting issued what I remember being called BLIPS or something like that. They were basically Gargoyles shaped sunglasses, about the color of those GI-19 lenses. There was also a secondary, clip-on lens in the set that had a mirrored, green-fly color to it. I think I still have a couple sets of these squirreled away somewhere : )
Those would be the surplus BLPS (ballistic laser protective spectacles) glasses I mentioned in my first post about eyewear in this thread. When I was trying to find eyewear for myself I learned they come in clear (ballistic only protection), grey (sunglasses), green (2 wavelengths: 694.3nm and 1064nm both at optical density 4), and brown (3 wavelengths: 532nm, 694.3nm, and 1064nm all at optical density 4). Finding a datasheet on the wavelength specifics was a serious hunt for me. Ultimately I got the wavelength info from this forum post.

And that's probably more than enough (too much, I think) on eyepro. That said, it IS important for anyone contemplating the use of full power lasers, as your post about your brothers in arms and their documented laser damage attests.
 
Personally I’d skip the commercial fallout echo and get some decent Gen 3 elbit or l3 tubes. The Gen 3’s will have better low light performance and last longer than the fallout echo. The only photonis tubes that come close to even filmed Gen 3 in lowlight are the 4g itens. I’ve seen dealers selling echo fallout systems for more than you can buy some nice Omni 7 or 8 contract tubed systems.

Here are my tnvc WP elbit RNVG’s. Mk18 1.5,with a Steiner i2 surefire new version 952v, g19.5 rmr x300v, Also have a perst 4 on one of my mk12’s and a tlr vir ii on a ltt beretta elite. No pics of the 12’s :(.
 

Attachments

  • 38ACD89C-77BF-441C-BC9F-656005F4088D.jpeg
    38ACD89C-77BF-441C-BC9F-656005F4088D.jpeg
    71.2 KB · Views: 31
  • 605A09D0-C166-4983-A169-EBB6DB741278.jpeg
    605A09D0-C166-4983-A169-EBB6DB741278.jpeg
    77.1 KB · Views: 31
  • 0C13F8C2-976E-4107-BB5E-FFA16B12376A.jpeg
    0C13F8C2-976E-4107-BB5E-FFA16B12376A.jpeg
    88.4 KB · Views: 31
Also, in case ya'll didn't know, @TacShift is one of our vendors. It's @amnesia in case you're wondering. I've gotten two smoking deals from him in as many weeks. He's got some awesome lights and optics. Some of which are good for your night fighting/hunting setups.


I got a laser sight today and a Trijicon MRO a couple weeks ago. Cheaper than Amazon.
 
While there are better tube options out there, for sure, the Photonis Echo is still a decent option. Especially if you aren't interested in a long wait. Got an email from JRH today and they are shipping out the Echos in 2-5 business days from when you order.

Not terrible for a WP tube right at $3k. Think mine I got from him has a FOM of 2275.
Nice FOM. Gen 2 tube, though. I believe the lifespan question I noted about Gen2 gear dimming over its lifespan (based on the Harris-provided info) where Gen3 doesn't seem to do that (or doesn't to nearly the same degree) ... is still an issue, though.

I note this not to dis the Echoes, but because while some people may be able to just spend $3k on new nods that have gone dim from use every 2-5 years, for others, $3k purchases for nods may be a reach or even a lifetime purchase for many. Thus, I feel it's always important to discuss FOM -and- efficiency over lifespan when talking about Gen2 vs. Gen3 -- unless/until we have something that debunks the info Harris provided to the world on the topic. (Do we?)

Also, I didn't have a great experience with JRH. I had a few minor questions for them about something on their site, used their online web form to ask ... and here we are more than a month later with no reply, at all, to this date. Even nightvision4less (which I find unimpressive as a vendor) was far more responsive when I had similar minor questions about an item on their site. Ultimately I wrote JRH off for consideration because if they won't answer even basic questions from a serious prospect who has already done a lot of homework, it was a clear sign I couldn't count on them to be there for me if/when I need something more substantial. (As for 'why didn't you call?' Because they have a web form ... so I shouldn't have to. That's why. I like things in writing.)

I ultimately placed my order with a vendor (NVD) whose actions and responsiveness to my (few, and minor) questions clearly expressed it wanted and valued my business.
 
Last edited:
Nice FOM. Gen 2 tube, though. I believe the lifespan question I noted about Gen2 gear dimming over its lifespan (based on the Harris-provided info) where Gen3 doesn't seem to do that (or doesn't to nearly the same degree) ... is still an issue, though.

JRH says the lifespan is 10k+ hours for a Photonis Echo. I didn't want to call his knowledge into question, but I was reading a lot of things on the web that said that Gen2+ tubes did not last that long. JRH was adamant that they last 10k hours. Back when I was shopping for that first tube, I found a data sheet from Photonis that stated 10,000 hours, but despite my best efforts, I could not locate it again.

So, I figured I would just call Night Vision Devices and ask them. First off, I didn't really understand what was meant but "useable hours" or "lifespan". Tim at Night Vision Devices, who runs their service department, told me that it refers to "continuous use". According to Tim, Gen 2+ tubes are rated for 10,000 hours. Gen 3 tubes are rated for 12,000 hours. I have no reason to doubt Tim. Therefore, I'm not too worried about the Photonis Echo.

As for how recent I came upon this information? This afternoon. I hung up the phone 7 minutes ago.

There has been considerable back and forth about Echo tubes to begin with. This Afrcom thread is a very interesting read.

Understand your objections to JRH. I called him on the phone, never used the web to submit questions. He has been very responsive via phone and email. I think if he's not going to be responsive via the web form, he should just take it down.
 
One other thing about Night Vision stuff in general. And for this, I'm just going to copy and paste the post from the AR15.com thread because I thought he said it really well. The poster was ChandlerKJ.

I said this before to another guy in the community a little while back: I’m so offput by the fact that no one can get a straight answer on anything NVG related. It’s like the used car sales atmosphere of the firearms/whatever industry. It’s extremely discouraging. The problem is that it’s not a $12 magazine or a $80 trigger or even a $1400 upper. It’s multiple thousands of dollars that people are going to spend and expect a certain return from it.

I think part of this is that NVG is a super niche, high cost endeavor for most and the customers are slim pickings. So everyone is trying to sell their sh*t. Couple this with the fact that a lot of the performance data is understood by so few. I mean we can look up what a good performance number should be and gauge that to our sheet that came with our unit but most of us dont have 20 sets of 14s to look through to compare before we buy.

Finally, we are often asked to plop down our cash on the word that this sh*t is better than that sh*t without any try before you buy or comparison or whatever. Then, we are asked to wait sometimes weeks before we actually get our new unit and hope we made the right choice.

Dude makes solid points here and that is exactly why I started this thread. It is a massive pain in the neck. Most of the time I enjoy shopping for things. That was not really the case for night vision because there was so much information to wade through. And a touch of misinformation here and there didn't help me.

All we can really do is try to get to the bottom of it, but that is best accomplished as a crowd sourced effort. I don't have all the answers. Luckily we've got some folks here, like Surreal, Tim, Steelciocc, etc., so we might just be able to figure it all out. :)
 
Good link
JRH says the lifespan is 10k+ hours for a Photonis Echo. I didn't want to call his knowledge into question, but I was reading a lot of things on the web that said that Gen2+ tubes did not last that long. JRH was adamant that they last 10k hours. Back when I was shopping for that first tube, I found a data sheet from Photonis that stated 10,000 hours, but despite my best efforts, I could not locate it again.

<snip>

Understand your objections to JRH. I called him on the phone, never used the web to submit questions. He has been very responsive via phone and email. I think if he's not going to be responsive via the web form, he should just take it down.
Remember -- it's not just the life of the tube, it's the efficiency of it across its life that Harris was pointing out as a huge difference between Gen and Gen3 tech. The Harris vid I provided shows the tubes lasting the same period of time, but the efficiency of the G3 remained relatively constant while over time the Gen2 just got dimmer and dimmer. So, sure, a Gen2 tube may work for 10,000 hours, but how well it works (hence efficiency across its life) ... not just how long it works ... is potentially germane. No one seems to be able to tell us this empirically. I even question the Harris vid since they're a vendor, but they're in a position to know and, to do, it's the most definitive information provided on the subject so ... I'm stuck with it until I have better data.

I agree that if JRH isn't going to respond to the web form they should fry it. While talking about experiences, NVD was super responsive, easy to engage, great warranty -- no complaints, at all. nightvision4less responded by text which really felt weird ... but it was fast and accurate, so I can't complain -- but their warranty left a lot to be desired. TNVC has a great warranty and reputation but dealing with them was a total turnoff -- akin to 'talk to our sister company nightgoggles.com unless you have the cash to pony up for our tier 1 prices'. They didn't say those exact words, but that's pretty much what it boiled down to and how it felt. I actually liked the idea of nightgoggles.com, too, but they had no binos in stock and weren't taking any orders. Sadly, I learned the most from info put out there by TNVC, so I wanted to reward that ... but since they had no binos I could afford and nightgoggles.com had none I could afford in stock, well, they just wrote themselves off.


One other thing about Night Vision stuff in general. And for this, I'm just going to copy and paste the post from the AR15.com thread because I thought he said it really well. The poster was ChandlerKJ.

Dude makes solid points here and that is exactly why I started this thread. It is a massive pain in the neck. Most of the time I enjoy shopping for things. That was not really the case for night vision because there was so much info / misinformation to wade through.

All we can really do is try to get to the bottom of it, but that is best accomplished as a crowd sourced effort. I don't have all the answers. Luckily we've got some folks here, like Surreal, Tim, Steelciocc, etc., so we might just be able to figure it all out. :)
Good post and the point is valid. And heck yes, this was a quagmire to research. At some point it may make sense for you to lock a post and for you (and only you) to pull things out of our winding/twisting thread(s) to make something more succinct ... so that newcomers are spared some of the pain we went through ... without wading through pages and pages of drivel. :)

Hey man give us a review when you get a chance to try it out! I bought one for a friend of mine but we haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
I, too, want to see that!
 
Last edited:
Good link

Remember -- it's not just the life of the tube, it's the efficiency of it across its life that Harris was pointing out as a huge difference between Gen and Gen3 tech. The Harris vid I provided shows the tubes lasting the same period of time, but the efficiency of the G3 remained relatively constant while over time the Gen2 just got dimmer and dimmer. So, sure, a Gen2 tube may work for 10,000 hours, but how well it works (hence efficiency across its life) ... not just how long it works ... is potentially germane. No one seems to be able to tell us this empirically. I even question the Harris vid since they're a vendor, but they're in a position to know and, to do, it's the most definitive information provided on the subject so ... I'm stuck with it until I have better data.

I called NVD in the interest of trying to find out what the real deal is.
Now, if we don’t have any empirical data, where does your stat “2-5 years” for the Echo tube come from?

The video from Harris, who certainly has a conflict of interest, is FAR from definitive.

I am not disappointed with my Echo tube and have no reason to think it is subpar. It certainly has not been proven to me that it isn’t a good tube.

Therefore, I challenge you to prove that it does in fact dim over time. Or more to the point, that it degrades much faster than a Harris tube. If in fact you intend to disparage a recommendation, it has to be based on something other than a competitor’s video.

I would encourage everyone to read that Arfcom thread and pay close attention to the subject of degradation of L3 tubes over time.
 
Another thread that speaks to the lifespan of tubes.

 
Finally found a good bridge. They seem to be really hard to get. There’s a great one from KAC but Knights is known for making something for a little while and then not making it for a while. It is pretty tough to get right now. I heard someone say that they ha them in stock at one point recently. But sold out in an hour.


So the one I might end up with is the Mod Armory. Seem to be two different models with different features. Might be useful to those considering running two PVS-14s.


 
The white LLI cover was very disappointing; there was no appreciable difference after installing it...it simply made the green a bit less green, but green nonetheless. For reference, my 14s have an ITT Gen 3 tube

installation was simple as it screws right on the tube with no issues; pics are before install and after install. I didn’t attempt to take a pic through the 14s since there wasn’t any real difference...I was expecting a “wohoo” moment as I have never used a WP tube, but nothing.
I will reach out to LLI about this.

9E6A5823-5A3A-48B4-B473-BF0603238C4E.jpeg8F9ECBB3-9226-4FFA-AA09-6F9845D100EB.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom