Lafayette Gregory
Les-ter not Ly-Chester
In Georgia, do you or do you not disclose if stopped?
That site says it’s not tied to DL in Georgia. It is in NC tho iircDuty to disclose must be repealed. It creates instant justifiable OIS. Any move can be defined as "he was reaching for his gun." But the state will never release data on how many people Barney Fifes killed after complying with the stupid mandate.
And since it is tied to the DMV data base, the cop already knows. All they have to do is try to prevent you from making the required declaration, then they have another charge to add.
The two times I disclosed, both at accident scenes, the trooper looked at me like I was nuts for mentioning it.
I’ve disclosed multiple times to troopers. Once where it was on the seat next to me (with both hands out the window, license and CCW in hand). Asked if he wanted to come around and put it on the roof of the car. He said nah, just don’t reach for it.Duty to disclose must be repealed. It creates instant justifiable OIS. Any move can be defined as "he was reaching for his gun." But the state will never release data on how many people Barney Fifes killed after complying with the stupid mandate.
And since it is tied to the DMV data base, the cop already knows. All they have to do is try to prevent you from making the required declaration, then they have another charge to add.
The two times I disclosed, both at accident scenes, the trooper looked at me like I was nuts for mentioning it.
Someone here posted that his wife had a trooper back up, put his hand on his weapon after she disclosed and said "you aren't going to shoot me are you?" Highly inapropriate. Worse if the a-hole thought he was being cute.I’ve disclosed multiple times to troopers. Once where it was on the seat next to me (with both hands out the window, license and CCW in hand). Asked if he wanted to come around and put it on the roof of the car. He said nah, just don’t reach for it.
Yeah it’s the law to disclose. They should know that, and realize that someone who discloses is most likely not going to shoot them. This also makes me wonder how he didn’t already know they had a CCW by running the plates.Someone here posted that his wife had a trooper back up, put his hand on his weapon after she disclosed and said "you aren't going to shoot me are you?" Highly inapropriate. Worse if the a-hole thought he was being cute.
All of our vehicles are in my name. Thus a trooper pulling over my wife might not realize she's a packer too.Yeah it’s the law to disclose. They should know that, and realize that someone who discloses is most likely not going to shoot them. This also makes me wonder how he didn’t already know they had a CCW by running the plates.
Yeah I’ve always asked if they want to come set my firearm on the roof of the car and they never have. I also always have license and permit with both hands out the window, vehicle off by the time they approach. If they feel more comfortable by placing my pistol on the hood, that’s fine with me. Don’t want anyone getting skittish.Disclosure does not really bother me … it’s when those few “knee jerkers” decide to disarm someone. I’ve never had it happen, in fact all have basically said OK and gone on with their business, but I know a few who have. If a firearm is secured in a person’s vehicle that has been vetted by their county CLEO why does it need to be passed around unnecessarily? All that is asking for if an accidental discharge up to a wrong assumption shooting. My Grandma said … leave well enough alone … and that’s what should be done in my thoughts.
HA!The two times I disclosed, both at accident scenes, the trooper looked at me like I was nuts for mentioning it.
HA!
same thing up in Detroit. waited forever for the cops to show up, and when the cop finally came my way I said my usual "good afternoon officer, i am legally obligated to disclose that i have a license to carry a concealed firearm and I do have one with me today".
"uh... okay... anyway, what happened here?"
I've had incidents ranging from that up to "you're lucky I didn't see it first or i'd have my gun to your head..." and back down to "don't reach for yours and i won't reach for mine"
It would be fine with me to just not even have it come up anymore.
Someone here posted that his wife had a trooper back up, put his hand on his weapon after she disclosed and said "you aren't going to shoot me are you?" Highly inapropriate. Worse if the a-hole thought he was being cute.
Just don't do that in NJ, MD or MA if I remember correctly. I remember the story of a woman traveling through a state that disclosed, as was required in her state and ended up in jail.I always disclose. When I’m out of state, I’ll say NC Law requires me to disclose…. Universally I have had positive responses (thanked for disclosing) and most of the time they let me off with a warning for speeding.
If PD screened out just two types pf people, "polite and professional" would be the case 99.9% of the time. The two classes that should never be allowed to carry a badge and gun are those who were bullies in school and those who were bullied. Any honest study of excessive force incidents would find these two factors in the vast majority of cases.It galls me when people can't be polite and professional in response to someone else being polite and professional.
Surprisingly, MA is not a duty to disclose state. Also, an "unrestricted" carry permit there means one can carry open too. But most permit holders know that there are so many Karens and then Barney Fife cops, that it is generally not wise to carry open.Just don't do that in NJ, MD or MA if I remember correctly. I remember the story of a woman traveling through a state that disclosed, as was required in her state and ended up in jail.
That said, I've had positive responses to disclosing. Basically, from a "whatever" attitude to one seemingly rookie female officer in the upscale part of town that was like, "Ok" and went back to her car to look up what to do, before coming back and asking for my permit. Never once asking where the gun was.
In Boston, only doctors, lawyers, wealthy political donors, and licensed firearms instructors get permits approved despite that policy being illegal under MA law.
Good clarification.Just don't do that in NJ, MD or MA if I remember correctly. I remember the story of a woman traveling through a state that disclosed, as was required in her state and ended up in jail.
Exactly. State police follow the law, no illegal added doc reqs. Many local CLEO's add letters of reference requirements, additional class requirements. Lowell used to require proof that one had already been a victim of violent crime and proof of continuing threat. Criminals love cities like that. Lowell PD also had a rep of being very corrupt. I lived in Lowell before escaping south of the Mason-Dixon.As a NH resident it was easier for me to go though the State Police to get a non-res permit than residents who had to start at the local PO and go up.
I lived in Lowell...
I’ve heard that the CHP is not tied to your tag from a cop that I know and trust. So it’s either on a tab that no one looks at or it’s actually not there.
My question picks up after the disclosure. Are you required to “comply” if they demand you disarm and/or give them the gun? My response, if this ever happens, is that the gun is most safe for everyone tightly tucked against my side. I’d prefer not to.
I can't imagine any officer ordering a person to do something that requires them to put their hands on their own gun unless the officer has turned off all the cameras and wants to create an excuse to kill someone.If you are given a direct order, then yes.
The question here is whether or not the officer is issuing an illegal order to disarm. The answer to this is "no". So far as I know there are no laws on the books which make such an order illegal, especially under the circumstances being discussed here.
Did this mean there is no room for objection or discussion? No... but this may be a fine line to cross. Your choice.
This. Even if I don't have a weapon, I have the CC permit and my DL ready. Hand him the DL and show the CC permit, with a statement of if i do or don't have a weapon at that time. No negative experiences here, and I have a handful of speeding tickets....I just preach the “don’t give them a reason” approach. If you don’t have to reach for license or permit, it’s better for everyone. Have it outside the window and ready for them. You know what they are gonna ask for. Prepare for it and skip the rest.
same here - I hand them my permit on top of my license so they see it first.My method of disclosing is to hand my license and the permit at the same time holding them so both can be seen. I got stopped once at a check point and was struggling to get the permit out and the trooper looked up and saw what I was doing and said "you don't need that". Hand my license back and said have a nice day.
I'm not willing to be shot or handcuffed over it--but it will be brought up before I pull out a cocked and ready to rock gun with no safety. Odds of it doing something dangerous while tucked in my waistband = 0.1%. Odds of somethign sideways if it comes out = higher than 0.1%.If you are given a direct order, then yes.
The question here is whether or not the officer is issuing an illegal order to disarm. The answer to this is "no". So far as I know there are no laws on the books which make such an order illegal, especially under the circumstances being discussed here.
Did this mean there is no room for objection or discussion? No... but this may be a fine line to cross. Your choice.
Assuming this weapon is attached to a holster on your belt, slowly lift your shirt, undo the buckle, and drop your pants. Why not make it awkward for everyone involved?I'm not willing to be shot or handcuffed over it--but it will be brought up before I pull out a cocked and ready to rock gun with no safety. Odds of it doing something dangerous while tucked in my waistband = 0.1%. Odds of somethign sideways if it comes out = higher than 0.1%.
I'm not willing to be shot or handcuffed over it--but it will be brought up before I pull out a cocked and ready to rock gun with no safety. Odds of it doing something dangerous while tucked in my waistband = 0.1%. Odds of somethign sideways if it comes out = higher than 0.1%.
most times very cool response and no tickets
once was disarmed and the officer then said he ran serial numbers to see if they were stolen. returned to me with ammo removed from mags. no ticket at least for tail light out
guy was polite but i still feel/felt my 4th amendment rights violated. they were basically taken off the front seat and the driver door panel. i never verbally consented to them taking them….
He was bullied in high school. Has some kind of complex.That's the part that gets me. Why remove the ammo? That meant the officer had to remove the gun from it's holster, then unload and cycle the action on the weapon.
Stu. Pid.