Beretta M9 vs. SIG M17: Pros and Cons - Gun Guys with Bill Wilson and Massad Ayoob

I have not shot the SIG, but have puh-lenty of experience with the M9. It's a soft-shooting gun, easy to strip and clean, and takes a beating. My only negative is that it's a big frame for us fella's with smaller hands. But it was long due a replacement.
 
Has anyone here shot the Wilson Sig with the Action Tune? Not that I think I would spend $1350 on a P320 but I would be interested to hear what people think of it vs the stock gun.
 
Has anyone here shot the Wilson Sig with the Action Tune? Not that I think I would spend $1350 on a P320 but I would be interested to hear what people think of it vs the stock gun.
I would suggest looking at Grayguns - the trigger kit they offer is the best in my opinion.
The Beretta is a great gun , its reputation has been tarnished my ex-military folks that have experience with firearms that have tens of thousands or rounds through them with poor or no maintenance.
I have experience with both - apples and oranges - i would take either one. Pick one and practice . Any reliable gun will work but most folks don’t shoot or practice much
 
Fell asleep half way thru the video. Sam Booya voice just puts me to sleep. Ive owned 2 M9's. They both suh...'d, I mean were terrible. Terrible trigger and terrible accuracy. One was NIB and the other had 1000 rnds of 115g ball thru it. They were however, reliable. I own 2 Sig P250's now. The precursor to the 320. I'm not a big fan of striker fired guns although I have a couple. Still can't believe the military went with a gun where you can't see the hammer and whether it is back or not. Both those guns in that video were Wilson Combat and not box stock guns the military was buying. Apples and oranges. Not a big fan of either of those 2 gentleman either but thats a story for another day.
 
Fell asleep half way thru the video. Sam Booya voice just puts me to sleep. Ive owned 2 M9's. They both suh...'d, I mean were terrible. Terrible trigger and terrible accuracy. One was NIB and the other had 1000 rnds of 115g ball thru it. They were however, reliable. I own 2 Sig P250's now. The precursor to the 320. I'm not a big fan of striker fired guns although I have a couple. Still can't believe the military went with a gun where you can't see the hammer and whether it is back or not. Both those guns in that video were Wilson Combat and not box stock guns the military was buying. Apples and oranges. Not a big fan of either of those 2 gentleman either but thats a story for another day.
From a completely unbiased standpoint, can I ask what’s the issue with the 2 fellas in the vid? I have no lean one way or the other for either b/c I don’t know about either of them but I’m curious
 
Back
Top Bottom