This is an exegesis of the Olivet discourse found in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21.
This is a very, very, very long post that will have to be broken up into smaller parts. Also I numbered the paragraphs for easier reference...I'm not infallible. If I get something historically wrong, let me know and I'll fix it. In this post, I add my opinions. Previous posts where meant to be neutral to all viewpoints. Feel free to disagree.
Here are the other Prophecy Studies
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 6
This narrative is an exegesis of Matthew 24, and some parts of Mark 13, and Luke 21. Specifically it deals with the first 35 verses of Matthew 24, and includes historical accounts of events, many of which were seen firsthand. Detailed in this exegesis, is the historical fulfillment of Matthew 24/Mark 13/Luke 21, as written about by Josephus, Tacitus, Suetonius, and Eusebius; historians that document this proven miraculous event. Other sources included are: Phillip Schaff, in his book on The History of the Christian Church, George Peter Holford's book on The Destruction of Jerusalem, The Story of the Last Days of Jerusalem, from Josephus by Alfred J. Church, and more that will be listed at the end.
An incredible addition to this narrative is this video on the Destruction of Jerusalem:
For the vast majority of Church history [1900 years,] all denominations of the Church, including Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant, taught that this prophecy was fulfilled from the 40 years between Christ’s crucifixion, to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The following is a list of quotations from Christians through the life of the Church concerning Matthew 24’s fulfillment in 70 AD:
“All this occurred in this manner in the second year of the reign of Vespasian [A.D. 70], according to the predictions of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. “—Eusebius
“Thousands and thousands of men of every age who together with women and children perished by the sword, by starvation, and by countless other forms of death…all this anyone who wishes can gather in precise detail from the pages of Josephus’s history. I must draw particular attention to his statement that the people who flocked together from all Judaea at the time of the Passover Feast and—to use his own words—were shut up in Jerusalem as if in a prison, totaled nearly three million.” —Eusebius
“This was most punctually fulfilled: for after the temple was burned, Titus the Roman general ordered the very foundations of it to be dug up; after which the ground on which it stood was ploughed by Turnus Rufus…this generation of men living shall not pass till all these things be done—The expression implies that a great part of that generation would be passed away, but not the whole. Just so it was; for the city and temple were destroyed thirty–nine or forty years after.” —John Wesley
“ You will preach everywhere…. Then he added, “This gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world, as a testimony to all nations; and the end will come.” The sign of this final end time will be the downfall of Jerusalem.” —John Chrysostom
“There was a sufficient interval for the full proclamation of the gospel by the apostles and evangelists of the early Christian Church, and for the gathering of those who recognized the crucified Christ as the true Messiah. Then came the awful end which the Saviour foresaw and foretold, and the prospect of which wrung from His lips and heart the sorrowful lament that followed his prophecy of the doom awaiting his guilty capital. The destruction of Jerusalem was more terrible than anything that the world has ever witnessed, either before or since. Even Titus seemed to see in his cruel work the hand of an avenging God. Truly, the blood of the martyrs slain in Jerusalem was amply avenged when the whole city became a veritable Aceldama, or field of blood.” —Charles Spurgeon
“Hence it appears plain enough that the foregoing verses [Matt. 24:1–34] are not to be understood of the last judgment, but, as we said, of the destruction of Jerusalem. There were some among the disciples (particularly John), who lived to see these things come to pass.” —John Lightfoot
“And Verily I say unto you; and urge you to observe it, as absolutely necessary in order to understand what I have been saying, That this generation of men now living shall not pass away until all these things be fulfilled, for what I have foretold concerning the destruction of the Jewish state is so near at hand, that some of you shall live to see it accomplished with a dreadful exactness.” —Phillip Doddridge’
“ It is to me a wonder how any man can refer part of the foregoing discourse [Matt. 24] to the destruction of Jerusalem, and part to the end of the world, or any other distant event, when it is said so positively here in the conclusion, All these things shall be fulfilled in this generation”. —Thomas Newton
“This chapter contains a prediction of the utter destruction of the city and temple of Jerusalem, and the subversion of the whole political constitution of the Jews; and is one of the most valuable portions of the new covenant Scriptures, with respect to the evidence which it furnishes of the truth of Christianity. Every thing which our Lord foretold should come on the temple, city, and people of the Jews, has been fulfilled in the most correct and astonishing manner….” —Adam Clarke
“ Christ informs them, that before a single generation shall have been completed, they will learn by experience the truth of what he has said. For within fifty years the city was destroyed and the temple was razed, the whole country was reduced to a hideous desert.”—John Calvin
“ If Jesus and the early church used the relevant language in the same way as their contemporaries, it is highly unlikely that they would have been referring to the actual end of the world, and highly likely that they would have been referring to events within space–time history which they interpreted as the coming of the kingdom.” —N.T. Wright
“In this discourse [Matthew 24] Jesus predicts the destruction of the temple, the destruction of Jerusalem, and the dispersion of the Jews, all of which took place in A.D. 70. The uncanny accuracy of these predictions is embarrassing to higher critics…. “—R.C. Sproul
****
Theologians identify 4 schools of Biblical Eschatology (end times teaching): Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism. These schools are primarily, but not entirely, bound to end times teaching with regard to the Revelation of Jesus Christ by the Apostle John. Related to this, and intertwined are the 4 views of the Millenium (Revelation chapter 20): Millenium: Amillennialism, Premillennialism, Postmillennialism, and Full-Preterism. The 4 schools of eschatology and the 4 views of the Millennium do not line up neatly with each other; as a result there are many subgroups inside the schools that have distinctive Millennial allegiance.
Starting in the 19th century, a new school of eschatological interpretation was developed. This view, known as Dispensationalism, is a subgroup of Futurist Premillennialism.
Starting with John Nelson Darby, Cyrus Schofield, Clarence Larkin, and a few key others who interpret Revelation as a totally future fulfillment, this passage in Matthew, Mark, and Luke began being interpreted as being yet unfulfilled by Dispensational teachers, being tied to futurist teachings with the book of Revelation. In this regard, they were in error. Regardless of their views of Revelation, this prophecy in Matthew 24 must be examined according to traditional church teaching. This narrative is an attempt to separate this passage from modern teaching, and let it stand alone apart from the book of Revelation.
Here is a great video teaching the 4 different schools of interpretation of Revelation. It is great information to examine with regard to the different views of end times teaching.
To be clear, this exegesis of Matthew 24 can go along with the 4 different schools of eschatology: Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism. It can also go along with the 4 different views of the Millenium: Amillennialism, Premillennialism, Postmillennialism, and Preterism. What it will contradict is the subgroup of Dispensationalism which is Premillennial futurism. This exegesis is not promoting any view of Revelation. It is meant to understand Matthew 24 and separate it from the book of Revelation entirely.
Part 1
Introduction
1 The Bible is the historical account of how God brought sinful humanity back to himself. God used a system of covenants and promises throughout the Bible to achieve this. The chief covenant of the Old Testament is the Mosaic covenant. It is a covenant of works; meaning if Israel obeys God's system of ceremonial, moral, civil, and Levitical laws, He will bless them as a nation, and if they disobey, He will curse them. That is the Old Covenant. That means, if Israel obeys, God must bless them, and if Israel disobeys, God must curse them to fulfill his end of the covenant.
2 The New Testament concerns the New Covenant, first prophesied in Jeremiah 31:31, and is a covenant of Grace. This covenant is given to us by grace, and all we need to accept its blessings is faith in Jesus as our Saviour. In Short, Old Covenant = Old Testament, and New Covenant = New Testament. When you think of Israel and Judaism, you're thinking of the Old Covenant, and when you are thinking of the Church, you are thinking about the new covenant. Jesus fulfilled the Old Covenant, and by doing so created the New Covenant. You cannot understand the Bible unless you understand it through the lens of the Old and New Covenants. You are unable to understand the ramifications of this Matthew 24 prophecy, unless you see it through its covenantal framework.
3 The New Covenant is where we get the Church. The word “church” [ ἐκκλησία] [ekklēsia], simply means an assembly of believers. That assembly is both Jewish and Gentiles. The New Covenant erased the racial and geographical boundaries that separated people in the Old Testament (Ephesians 2:14). So, the New Testament, or New Covenant, is the historical account of God using his son, through a New Covenant, to make the way back to the father through the church, for sinful humanity, both Jew and Gentile (Gal 3:29)
4 Matthew 24 is the prophetic announcement that Jesus made, signaling the destruction of Jerusalem, and the end of the Old Covenant forever. It is a prophecy foretelling future events, of the people that lived in 30 AD, and was fulfilled in 70 AD. It is a prophecy that was fulfilled in our past.
5 No new teaching will be introduced in this piece, only the understanding of the traditional interpretations of the Church will be found. Unfortunately, when some modern-day Bible prophecy teachers encounter prophecy, there is an inclination to put these passages into the future fulfillment of prophetic events of the End times. Matthew 24, the portion relating to Jerusalem…the first 35 verses belongs to the past, not the future. It was divinely fulfilled. That fulfillment will be demonstrated in this narrative.
This is a very, very, very long post that will have to be broken up into smaller parts. Also I numbered the paragraphs for easier reference...I'm not infallible. If I get something historically wrong, let me know and I'll fix it. In this post, I add my opinions. Previous posts where meant to be neutral to all viewpoints. Feel free to disagree.
Here are the other Prophecy Studies
Part 1
Bible Prophecy Part 1: introduction
Soon I'll begin posting threads about End times Bible prophecy. This post lists the loose order and subjects covered. I'm going to slowly roll this out. Hopefully this will reach the right readers, and some will benefit. My purpose? 1… to inform. I will first be posting a survey of the schools...
carolinafirearmsforum.com
Part 2
Bible Prophecy Part 2: schools of Eschatology
This is a small study on the different schools of Eschatology...or end times teaching. The Schools of Eschatology primarily deal with interpretation of the Revelation of Jesus by John. In this post, I'm trying to be as objective as possible and simply add information that helps illuminate...
carolinafirearmsforum.com
Part 3
Bible Prophecy Part 3: Eschatology in history
This is a series of lectures from a former lawyer/school professor on the changes of Eschatology in history. I'll post the whole series, and come back later to add more comments. This fella is a Presbyterian [ I am not ], but his biases are muted. He does an excellent job. T he 1st video...
carolinafirearmsforum.com
Part 4
Bible Prophecy Part 4: The Millennium
The Millennium -This thread deals with the different views of the Millennium. Discussions of the Millennium come from Revelation chapter 20. Many will list 3 views, but here in this study I list 4, as I break Traditional Premillennialism and Dispensational Premillennialism into different...
carolinafirearmsforum.com
Part 6
Bible Prophecy part 6: Daniel's 70 weeks
Bible Prophecy part 6: Daniel's 70 weeks This is a Bible Study on Daniel’s 70 weeks. This is part 6 The other Bible Prophecy studies are at these links. Prophecy CFF links Part 1 https://carolinafirearmsforum.com/index.php?threads/bible-prophecy-part-1-introduction.131283/ Part 2...
carolinafirearmsforum.com
This narrative is an exegesis of Matthew 24, and some parts of Mark 13, and Luke 21. Specifically it deals with the first 35 verses of Matthew 24, and includes historical accounts of events, many of which were seen firsthand. Detailed in this exegesis, is the historical fulfillment of Matthew 24/Mark 13/Luke 21, as written about by Josephus, Tacitus, Suetonius, and Eusebius; historians that document this proven miraculous event. Other sources included are: Phillip Schaff, in his book on The History of the Christian Church, George Peter Holford's book on The Destruction of Jerusalem, The Story of the Last Days of Jerusalem, from Josephus by Alfred J. Church, and more that will be listed at the end.
An incredible addition to this narrative is this video on the Destruction of Jerusalem:
For the vast majority of Church history [1900 years,] all denominations of the Church, including Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant, taught that this prophecy was fulfilled from the 40 years between Christ’s crucifixion, to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The following is a list of quotations from Christians through the life of the Church concerning Matthew 24’s fulfillment in 70 AD:
“All this occurred in this manner in the second year of the reign of Vespasian [A.D. 70], according to the predictions of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. “—Eusebius
“Thousands and thousands of men of every age who together with women and children perished by the sword, by starvation, and by countless other forms of death…all this anyone who wishes can gather in precise detail from the pages of Josephus’s history. I must draw particular attention to his statement that the people who flocked together from all Judaea at the time of the Passover Feast and—to use his own words—were shut up in Jerusalem as if in a prison, totaled nearly three million.” —Eusebius
“This was most punctually fulfilled: for after the temple was burned, Titus the Roman general ordered the very foundations of it to be dug up; after which the ground on which it stood was ploughed by Turnus Rufus…this generation of men living shall not pass till all these things be done—The expression implies that a great part of that generation would be passed away, but not the whole. Just so it was; for the city and temple were destroyed thirty–nine or forty years after.” —John Wesley
“ You will preach everywhere…. Then he added, “This gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world, as a testimony to all nations; and the end will come.” The sign of this final end time will be the downfall of Jerusalem.” —John Chrysostom
“There was a sufficient interval for the full proclamation of the gospel by the apostles and evangelists of the early Christian Church, and for the gathering of those who recognized the crucified Christ as the true Messiah. Then came the awful end which the Saviour foresaw and foretold, and the prospect of which wrung from His lips and heart the sorrowful lament that followed his prophecy of the doom awaiting his guilty capital. The destruction of Jerusalem was more terrible than anything that the world has ever witnessed, either before or since. Even Titus seemed to see in his cruel work the hand of an avenging God. Truly, the blood of the martyrs slain in Jerusalem was amply avenged when the whole city became a veritable Aceldama, or field of blood.” —Charles Spurgeon
“Hence it appears plain enough that the foregoing verses [Matt. 24:1–34] are not to be understood of the last judgment, but, as we said, of the destruction of Jerusalem. There were some among the disciples (particularly John), who lived to see these things come to pass.” —John Lightfoot
“And Verily I say unto you; and urge you to observe it, as absolutely necessary in order to understand what I have been saying, That this generation of men now living shall not pass away until all these things be fulfilled, for what I have foretold concerning the destruction of the Jewish state is so near at hand, that some of you shall live to see it accomplished with a dreadful exactness.” —Phillip Doddridge’
“ It is to me a wonder how any man can refer part of the foregoing discourse [Matt. 24] to the destruction of Jerusalem, and part to the end of the world, or any other distant event, when it is said so positively here in the conclusion, All these things shall be fulfilled in this generation”. —Thomas Newton
“This chapter contains a prediction of the utter destruction of the city and temple of Jerusalem, and the subversion of the whole political constitution of the Jews; and is one of the most valuable portions of the new covenant Scriptures, with respect to the evidence which it furnishes of the truth of Christianity. Every thing which our Lord foretold should come on the temple, city, and people of the Jews, has been fulfilled in the most correct and astonishing manner….” —Adam Clarke
“ Christ informs them, that before a single generation shall have been completed, they will learn by experience the truth of what he has said. For within fifty years the city was destroyed and the temple was razed, the whole country was reduced to a hideous desert.”—John Calvin
“ If Jesus and the early church used the relevant language in the same way as their contemporaries, it is highly unlikely that they would have been referring to the actual end of the world, and highly likely that they would have been referring to events within space–time history which they interpreted as the coming of the kingdom.” —N.T. Wright
“In this discourse [Matthew 24] Jesus predicts the destruction of the temple, the destruction of Jerusalem, and the dispersion of the Jews, all of which took place in A.D. 70. The uncanny accuracy of these predictions is embarrassing to higher critics…. “—R.C. Sproul
****
Theologians identify 4 schools of Biblical Eschatology (end times teaching): Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism. These schools are primarily, but not entirely, bound to end times teaching with regard to the Revelation of Jesus Christ by the Apostle John. Related to this, and intertwined are the 4 views of the Millenium (Revelation chapter 20): Millenium: Amillennialism, Premillennialism, Postmillennialism, and Full-Preterism. The 4 schools of eschatology and the 4 views of the Millennium do not line up neatly with each other; as a result there are many subgroups inside the schools that have distinctive Millennial allegiance.
Starting in the 19th century, a new school of eschatological interpretation was developed. This view, known as Dispensationalism, is a subgroup of Futurist Premillennialism.
Starting with John Nelson Darby, Cyrus Schofield, Clarence Larkin, and a few key others who interpret Revelation as a totally future fulfillment, this passage in Matthew, Mark, and Luke began being interpreted as being yet unfulfilled by Dispensational teachers, being tied to futurist teachings with the book of Revelation. In this regard, they were in error. Regardless of their views of Revelation, this prophecy in Matthew 24 must be examined according to traditional church teaching. This narrative is an attempt to separate this passage from modern teaching, and let it stand alone apart from the book of Revelation.
Here is a great video teaching the 4 different schools of interpretation of Revelation. It is great information to examine with regard to the different views of end times teaching.
To be clear, this exegesis of Matthew 24 can go along with the 4 different schools of eschatology: Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism. It can also go along with the 4 different views of the Millenium: Amillennialism, Premillennialism, Postmillennialism, and Preterism. What it will contradict is the subgroup of Dispensationalism which is Premillennial futurism. This exegesis is not promoting any view of Revelation. It is meant to understand Matthew 24 and separate it from the book of Revelation entirely.
Part 1
Introduction
1 The Bible is the historical account of how God brought sinful humanity back to himself. God used a system of covenants and promises throughout the Bible to achieve this. The chief covenant of the Old Testament is the Mosaic covenant. It is a covenant of works; meaning if Israel obeys God's system of ceremonial, moral, civil, and Levitical laws, He will bless them as a nation, and if they disobey, He will curse them. That is the Old Covenant. That means, if Israel obeys, God must bless them, and if Israel disobeys, God must curse them to fulfill his end of the covenant.
2 The New Testament concerns the New Covenant, first prophesied in Jeremiah 31:31, and is a covenant of Grace. This covenant is given to us by grace, and all we need to accept its blessings is faith in Jesus as our Saviour. In Short, Old Covenant = Old Testament, and New Covenant = New Testament. When you think of Israel and Judaism, you're thinking of the Old Covenant, and when you are thinking of the Church, you are thinking about the new covenant. Jesus fulfilled the Old Covenant, and by doing so created the New Covenant. You cannot understand the Bible unless you understand it through the lens of the Old and New Covenants. You are unable to understand the ramifications of this Matthew 24 prophecy, unless you see it through its covenantal framework.
3 The New Covenant is where we get the Church. The word “church” [ ἐκκλησία] [ekklēsia], simply means an assembly of believers. That assembly is both Jewish and Gentiles. The New Covenant erased the racial and geographical boundaries that separated people in the Old Testament (Ephesians 2:14). So, the New Testament, or New Covenant, is the historical account of God using his son, through a New Covenant, to make the way back to the father through the church, for sinful humanity, both Jew and Gentile (Gal 3:29)
4 Matthew 24 is the prophetic announcement that Jesus made, signaling the destruction of Jerusalem, and the end of the Old Covenant forever. It is a prophecy foretelling future events, of the people that lived in 30 AD, and was fulfilled in 70 AD. It is a prophecy that was fulfilled in our past.
5 No new teaching will be introduced in this piece, only the understanding of the traditional interpretations of the Church will be found. Unfortunately, when some modern-day Bible prophecy teachers encounter prophecy, there is an inclination to put these passages into the future fulfillment of prophetic events of the End times. Matthew 24, the portion relating to Jerusalem…the first 35 verses belongs to the past, not the future. It was divinely fulfilled. That fulfillment will be demonstrated in this narrative.
Last edited: