If you would stop asking women at church to take off their shoes you would be welcomed. Nobody wants to see a grown man sucking toes at communion.Not any church I've ever been in.
If you would stop asking women at church to take off their shoes you would be welcomed. Nobody wants to see a grown man sucking toes at communion.Not any church I've ever been in.
How do you figure?
While I will agree that two out of three “good” guys paid a terrible price, their actions kept the number of “good” folks either injured/killed from going higher...had they not acted, there’d most likely be a lot more good folks in the hospital or funeral home.
Numbers did favor the good guys.
Well I run the soundboard in my church. I sit in the back behind a fairly large desk type structure in the back and have a pretty good view of the sanctuary. I carry a compact 9mm most of the time but I have been known to have a full sized pistol depending. They are either of the 1911 or Glock family which are the two platforms I am very familiar with and feel most comfortable running. There have been times, higher alert holidays and current events times, when I have even taken in an AR pistol in a discreet bag. Call me paranoid but I’d rather have it if that 1 in a billion event strikes. Looking at a shotgun vs compact 9mm ... that’s nearing the “knife to a gunfight” thing and if a shooter pops up with semiauto type rifle I know I’m S.O.L.! Your paranoid is my prepared.All those people packing pistols in church is mind boggling to begin with. That level of paranoia or whatever makes zero sense if no one is waiting at the door to formally greet everyone. The eight ball is easy to spot in most cases. Faith and openness seems a little guarded with all those guns anyhow. This shooting is a tragedy of un disciplined security. The risk of offending someone might be justified from now on.
Look at the video lot of "good guys" acted recklessly and put more people at risk. One good guy with enough training ended this.
Yes, some of them did act recklessly and swept a whole buncha people, putting them at risk. I’m fairly sure this video will be viewed and analyzed multiple times. I’d imagine the points you brought up will be addressed with the security team/congregation.
That aside, no one was harmed and the numbers did, in fact, favor the good guys.
One good guy with training did personally end this, but I do not believe that should detract from the actions of the first two fellows that were shot. There’s a part of me that believes the miscreant’s focus on those two guys up front played a role in Wilson being able to do what he did, in addition to the skills he possessed.
How do you figure?
While I will agree that two out of three “good” guys paid a terrible price, their actions kept the number of “good” folks either injured/killed from going higher...had they not acted, there’d most likely be a lot more good folks in the hospital or funeral home.
Numbers did favor the good guys.
Losing two "good guys" is not an acceptable trade to stop a broken person who should have been removed from society long ago.
Bingo on the TRAINING! I saw maybe 3 to 4 people who I’d now trust on my team with their actions. Mr Wilson I the head of that church’s security team and I honestly think he needs to do an AAR and evaluate who responded and how. In an interview he said the team had eyes on the shooter from when he first entered the building ... the greeters and such alerted as to appearance but the shooter made no threatening moves until that fateful 6 seconds.Look at the video lot of "good guys" acted recklessly and put more people at risk. One good guy with enough training ended this. The majority of those armed and who drew did not. To me it is a wake up call. Which one will you be? The guy who took the head shot or the women directing people out of the pew with her gun?
Indeed it is. In the long run, we need to keep the focus on removing dangerous people from society rather than limiting the damage they cause..No, it isn’t acceptable. But it is, sadly, preferable to losing 3-30 in this scenario.
Thou shalt not kill! Remember that one?
Watching the video I'm quite certain the second security person being referenced is the first person maggot shot. He did not get a shot off, maggot fired three times, Mr. Wilson only once. I counted seven armed parishioners in the video.
Unless I am completely misreading things, the article Amp posted suggests otherwise.
You are reading the article correctly, however I'm stating that article is most likely incorrect based on the video evidence. Sadly, it is not uncommon to have incorrect info in news articles within the first 48 hours of an event.
Below is a screen shot from the video right as Mr. Wilson's bullet is connecting with the shooter. I have added a red arrow to the only other person in frame that has a weapon in hand, and that individual has just started to draw his weapon. No other shots were fired after this point in time in the video.
View attachment 179240
The Bible is full of contradictions. People have justified killing each other, as well as non-christians, based on scripture since before He died. Ours was a turn the other cheek kind of church back then. It and the Baptist Church next door are taken over by Mexican Holy Rollers now, for what that's worth. That head shot came way too late in my opinion, if it could not have been avoided in the first place. It should have been avoided if that many people were truly prepared for violence. BTW, was that intentional or a miss of center mass? Might as well get gorey since we're celebrating.
Indeed it is. In the long run, we need to keep the focus on removing dangerous people from society rather than limiting the damage they cause..
On the surface, you’ll be better off asking, “what am I missing here?” And consider context, intended audience, culture, original language, etc.The Bible is full of contradictions.
What the farfenfnuegen... who’s celebrating?!?Might as well get gorey since we're celebrating.
Indeed it is. In the long run, we need to keep the focus on removing dangerous people from society rather than limiting the damage they cause..
, but when the guy started to draw a weapon he was out of options except but to shoot.
The Lord claims vengeance is His...
I like the Old Testament character of the Blood Avenger as well.And it is, but there are times when He is willing to subcontract it out.
And of course, Ecclesiastes 3, which says things like "a time to kill" and "a time of war"Luke 22:36 He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.
He could have. If he had thought it out. But do you think he was the kind of person who burdened with an overabundance of intelligence?He could have dropped his weapon and lived. That was a very available option.
My church wasn't inclusive. You had to be known to attend & I believe everyone was armed. We weren't inclusive as we weren't out for money. And this is an open forum dickbreath.If you would stop asking women at church to take off their shoes you would be welcomed. Nobody wants to see a grown man sucking toes at communion.
I considered this as well. He didn't shoot the first guy he as talking to immediately. And the second guy being slow on the draw might have made him think he had the advantage and he was going to get shot anyway. Then after the first shot, he was beyond the point of no return. BUT, when he turns the gun on the parishioners with what appeared to be intent to shoot, that tells me it was not a botched robbery, but an act of intentional violence. At least, that's my view.You might consider that the bad guy may not have been there to shoot anyone. Maybe he was, maybe he wanted to rob folks like Jessie James, thinking he would fleece the sheep, but when the guy started to draw a weapon he was out of options except but to shoot.
@Cpippen That isn't making excuses either. If all he did was rob people they would have been justified to shoot him then too.
Indeed.BUT, when he turns the gun on the parishioners with what appeared to be intent to shoot, that tells me it was not a botched robbery, but an act of intentional violence. At least, that's my view.
You don't tell me how to wash feet. And if I want to suck on them and then dry them with my hair, well that's just following the bible's lead... but you don't get to tell me which hair either.If you would stop asking women at church to take off their shoes you would be welcomed. Nobody wants to see a grown man sucking toes at communion.
Was that an intentional Firefly reference?He could have. If he had thought it out. But do you think he was the kind of person who burdened with an overabundance of intelligence?
This is new to me, what kind of exclusive church was it?My church wasn't inclusive. You had to be known to attend
Scripture teaches to be welcoming to strangers, especially the down and out, not for the purpose of money grubbing.We weren't inclusive as we weren't out for money.
Christian Identity. The organised religion I'm familiar with only grows by preying on weak-minded folks & separating them from their money. Mostly deal in that new testament nonsense.This is new to me, what kind of exclusive church was it?
Scripture teaches to be welcoming to strangers, especially the down and out, not for the purpose of money grubbing.
Was that an intentional Firefly reference?
Christian Identity. The organised religion I'm familiar with only grows by preying on weak-minded folks & separating them from their money. Mostly deal in that new testament nonsense.
The Wiki description makes it appear that’s either prison groups Nazi or KKK.Christian Identity.