Former neurosurgeon says masks are ineffective against COVID-19 and can cause health problems

12151791

GUNS AND COFFEE
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
Joined
Dec 18, 2016
Messages
12,333
Location
Clover, SC
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
'One should not attack and insult those who have chosen not to wear a mask'
Aaron Colen
A former neurosurgeon wrote an op-ed published Thursday warning that face masks are not only ineffective against the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, but they can be potentially dangerous in some circumstances.

Dr. Russell Blaylock wrote for Technocracy that people who aren't sick should not wear a face mask. The publication of his opinion piece comes as more businesses and locales make masks a requirement, such as in Los Angeles where residents are now required to wear a mask when they leave their homes.

Blaylock said that since there have not yet been any studies of the effectiveness of masks in slowing or preventing COVID-19 transmission, the best thing that can be done is to look at what impact masks have been proven to have against the flu. He cited a 2012 analysis on this point:

As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, "None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection."
Blaylock noted that people wearing the most effective masks, N95 respirators, are at risk of negative effects of having their oxygen intake limited for extended periods of time.

It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.
Blaylock wrote that lower blood-oxygen levels can impair a person's immunity, potentially increasing their risk of contracting infections, including COVID-19. Also, a person who has a respiratory infection and wears a mask is expelling some of that virus with each breath and rebreathing it in, potentially leading to higher concentrations of the virus in the lungs and nasal passages, or even the brain — which that can make COVID-19 more dangerous.

"One should not attack and insult those who have chosen not to wear a mask, as these studies suggest that is the wise choice to make," Blaylock concluded.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend the use of cloth face coverings, not surgical masks or N95 respirators, for people in public settings where social distancing is difficult or impossible.

In February, U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams issued a public statement telling people to "STOP BUYING MASKS" because "They are NOT effective in preventing the general public from catching coronavirus."

In March, Adams stood by the stance that healthy people should not wear masks, saying they cause people to touch their faces more and provide a false sense of security.
 
I am of this opinion.
I do not wear a mask unless I "have to" to go in a store I want to go in.
What did everyone do for so many years with the flu??!! (Gasp!)
God gave me an immune system and common sense! If someone is coughing or sneezing on an aisle....I avoid that aisle!

DS
 
I have about 100 employees wearing masks, they have been doing it since the start and it’s costing me a small fortune. So far no reported adverse effects and not a single case of any flu. They are also wearing gloves and using hand sanitizer. Maybe it’s medically unnecessary, but they are happy and productive so I don’t care.
 
He's wrong. Sure the actual virus is smaller than the mask will filter but those molecules aren't floating around in the air. To be spread they have to be in a carrier solution which will be filtered by a mask.

I'm not sure his credentials as a surgeon are relevant to this disease.
 
I saw a video yesterday on YT of an interview the eminent Dr Fauci [emoji2961] had with 60 Minutes. He stated he didn't think that Americans needed to be wearing masks. Interview was May 8th, I believe.
Too many conflicting statements from the so-called authoritahs, IMO.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 
Sometimes it's the placebo effect that keeps the people moving.
In the 50s and 60s it was duck and cover and fall out shelters, now it's a mask. Whatever.
 
There’s evidence of protection from N-95 masks when they are used in high risk areas, such as ICUs (mainly Hong Kong, Japan, and Vietnam experience). I don’t wear mine outside of high risk areas, just because it’s a PIA. Those KN-95 masks from hardware stores are a little more comfortable. I wear cloth masks in stores, mainly to protect others from me in case I’m carrying virus without symptoms.

On another note, there are online calculators for those who want to know their risk. I like the idea of estimating the patients risks individually.

Fauci a prolific researcher , but he hasn’t treated a patient since Gilda Radner and Bill Murray were on the Saturday Night Live cast.
 
I find that wearing a mask keeps me from touching my face because its a constant reminder. I am more aware of my hands and less likely to get complacent.
 
I think washing your hands and general cleanliness is much more effective. May be even spraying alcohol cleaning your work space and door handles. Some people just get to close during normal conversation, I've never liked that.
 
I wear cloth masks in stores, mainly to protect others from me in case I’m carrying virus without symptoms.

DING! DING! DING! Winner!

I used to think that all those people in Japan, etc. were walking around with masks because of the congestion, and fear of catching something.

Wrong! My son, who is big into manga, anime and all that culture, informed me several years ago that they aren't typically afraid of catching something. They already have a cold or something and wear them as courtesy to others. Not to protect themselves.

I happen to have a couple boxes of the yellow isolation procedure masks from when my wife did peritoneal dialysis, so I've been using them. I only wear them when I know social distancing will be nearly impossible. Stores, etc.

Don't let the mask of any sort give a false sense of security. I used to do a sterile procedure twice a day without gloves. Why? because they aren't sterile, give that sense of security but impede your sense of touch. Any touch or breath or air moving on the hookup parts contaminate and cause peritonitis. I had to turn off the HVAC as well. 3 years, no infection because we were always mindful and of course serious hand washing.
 
and the idiocy continues...

https://www.cbs17.com/news/north-ca...e-to-wear-a-face-mask-amid-covid-19-pandemic/

Jeremy Howard, a data scientist at the University of San Francisco, signed a letter with more than 100 other experts, including those at Duke and UNC, calling on states to mandate masks.


“There are people that aren’t wearing masks. They’re going to put my family at risk. They’re going to put me at risk. So, if we’re actually going to avoid a second outbreak and keep the economy open, it’s so important that everybody wears a mask,” said Howard.

Wayadaminit- if he's wearing a mask, how will someone not wearing one infect him or his family?

I swear to cow, these people...
 
I'm not sure his credentials as a surgeon are relevant to this disease.

While he knows more about medical stuff than you and I - I agree, Id rather listen to a person who deals with viruses than a surgeon on matters of viruses.
 
Not wearing one unless I have to, to get into a store that I absolutely have convinced myself I have to have something that is inside. 99% of people wandering around wearing some sort of mask think they are protecting themselves. And then there is this guy: https://www.wral.com/coronavirus/nb...ecovering-in-hospital-from-covid-19/19096817/
I read a fun study from a few years back last night. they did their best to correlate mask usage with infection rates of h1n1 or other flu viruses. They found pretty much no effect of surgical masks, very weak effect of n95 fitted face respirators even though n95 is known to be very effective agaisnt h1n1. The biggest factor was the fact that was that even if you wear your mask 90% of the time, that extra 10% that you don't wear it makes about 80% drop in protection. 20% of the time without a mask was like 95% drop in effect. Now that's with a GOOD fitted face respirator used by people who are trained to use them right...

Wife gets mad that I don't wear a mask when I go out... But she's the one who does most of the shopping. When I go, I go to smaller stores and keep away from people (that's not a virus thing, that's just what i've always done).
On the bright side, I don't have to avoid people at work because i'm the quality manager so they avoid me at all costs.

I have about 100 employees wearing masks, they have been doing it since the start and it’s costing me a small fortune. So far no reported adverse effects and not a single case of any flu. They are also wearing gloves and using hand sanitizer. Maybe it’s medically unnecessary, but they are happy and productive so I don’t care.
Yep. this right here. but if it keeps people working and the business running, it's probably worth the cost.
We had our staff panicking and threatening to walk off the job - until they got a $2/hr boost in pay. That calmed their fears of infection pretty quickly. We also started providing surgical masks if people wanted them and forcing them to actually DO the cleaning they're supposed to be doing anyway. Most people don't really wear the masks. Wouldn't do them any good anyway since they all take them off and cluster up to talk among themselves in the slow times. ("she looks clean, i can risk it" is never a good plan).
Mind you, the people who complained the loudest about the risk of transmission were also the ones who fought me most when I started enforcing the corporate policies like "make sure you're pre-screened with the non-contact thermometer before you enter the building, put your dirty fingers all over the biometric time clock, touch the fridge and everything in the breakroom, hang out in the small locker room with other employees, etc." You know, the ones we could all get fired for not following since other branches have been shut down due to infection...
I just do what I always did. Maintain a professional and safe distance from others, wash my hands frequently and every time I'm leaving a production area or bathroom, use the paper towel to open the door, use a 70% or greater alcohol-based hand sanitizer often.
 
Don't let the mask of any sort give a false sense of security. I used to do a sterile procedure twice a day without gloves. Why? because they aren't sterile, give that sense of security but impede your sense of touch. Any touch or breath or air moving on the hookup parts contaminate and cause peritonitis. I had to turn off the HVAC as well. 3 years, no infection because we were always mindful and of course serious hand washing.
Well I'm confused. I know that most gloves aren't sterile, but you can get sterile gloves. Did you not have access or was the lack of touch sense enough that you had to make the compromise?
I never dealt with people, but for our research rats/mice, we had a tabletop autoclave and some pretty good routines to create sterile areas by spraying everything down with bleach or alcohol, iodine on the critters, spraying our gloves down frequently with alcohol during the process, etc.
We were studying exercising rats but had to do things like laminectomies and microinjections of assorted things into the spinal cord - so keeping infection down was pretty important or else the rats stopped exercising pretty quickly.

I did like to wear a mask for that, because have you ever shaved a rat when you're wickedly allergic to their dander?
 
Well I'm confused. I know that most gloves aren't sterile, but you can get sterile gloves. Did you not have access or was the lack of touch sense enough that you had to make the compromise?

We were taught to do it that way because of the sense of touch as well as the false sense of security that may cause a touch that you won't feel. We were taught that even if something like gloves and gauze are sterile in the pkg., it is merely clean when exposed to the environment. Serious handwashing and use of hand sanitizer prior to starting. That, cleaning the catheter with Alcavis, and the connections are capped and have betadine in them. Sounds counter intuitive and I was surprised when I took the training so Mrs. could be approved for the home treatments. They even came and inspected our home! Overkill? Don't know, but we did exactly what we were told and out of all the problems she had, peritonitis never happened.
 
He's wrong. Sure the actual virus is smaller than the mask will filter but those molecules aren't floating around in the air. To be spread they have to be in a carrier solution which will be filtered by a mask.

I'm not sure his credentials as a surgeon are relevant to this disease.


The carrier can evaporate from 10 plus micros to less than five in six feet. Also, next time you see someone with a mask on, look at the sides. Rarely is there not a gaping hole there.
 
Back
Top Bottom