I think you should take a knee if you apply for free stamps. My opinion.
Obeying unjust laws especially when the majority of the community is not obeying said law.Plus, what does "take a knee" even mean? Obeying the law?
Personally noDo you think the same thing about affixing a "brace" in the first place? Or filling out a 4473? Or getting a CCP?
More than likely not, you were happy about "saving" $200. Our mindsets are not quite the same on the subject.I may end up regretting the choice, if this gets shot down in legal challenges.
In My Opinion, there is no principled difference between paying for a stamp and not paying for one. The knee is bent either way.I think you should take a knee if you apply for free stamps. My opinion.
I have much less respect for those that hold ^that^ opinion than I do those that filed for a free stamp.Others spoke that you were "skating the law the whole time what exactly did you expect it was going to happen sooner or later."
It's legal or it's not. No in-between.
I think you should take a knee if you apply for free stamps. My opinion.
Obeying unjust laws especially when the majority of the community is not obeying said law.
You willingly gave up a right and you added one to the list of people who agreed that going the NFA route was not a hassle. Supporting the decision of the ATF to arbitrary change a ruling to regulate. Although you are just 1 of 250,000 that one is still one we do not need. As an FFL you are influencing others adding even more to that number. I do not know how old you are but you will be used as an example for more gun control in my lifetime as well as your childrens lifetime.Why?
It is currently not illegal to own a braced firearm. You complied before lawsuits were even settled.Are the majority of the community going to pay your legal bills?
Hard no. Didn't happen. That right was taken in1934 and we are paying ransom for it.You willingly gave up a right
Then why keep paying the ransom? Especially when they ask for ransom and it's not even required yet. Federal courts keep issuing stays on the brace ban for members of specific groups.Hard no. Didn't happen. That right was taken in1934 and we are paying ransom for it.
You willingly gave up a right and you added one to the list of people who agreed that going the NFA route was not a hassle. Supporting the decision of the ATF to arbitrary change a ruling to regulate. Although you are just 1 of 250,000 that one is still one we do not need. As an FFL you are influencing others adding even more to that number. I do not know how old you are but you will be used as an example for more gun control in my lifetime as well as your childrens lifetime.
If you have $14,000 in tax stamps you obviously have the money to pay $200. Instead you willingly held other firearm owners heads down while you walked to "save" money. As an sot you could have just manufacturered the SBR to avoid adding to that number and still "saved" $160ish after SN engraving
It is currently not illegal to own a braced firearm. You complied before lawsuits were even settled.
For me, it's because now the legal status of my ridiculous firearm is not in question, It's known. It cost me nothing and damaged me in no way to register one more SBR than I had already done.Then why keep paying the ransom? Especially when they ask for ransom and it's not even required yet. Federal courts keep issuing stays on the brace ban for members of specific groups.
Not having to register a firearm that they decide one day hurts their feelings.What did I willingly give up a right to?
You are seriously disgusting.They might be stocks disquised to look like something they pretend to be which is a handicapable something or other but theyre really just ugly stocks made for the sole purpose of circumventing the NFA
A flappy thing that goes around your arm on the end of a long tube? I'm no gynecologist but the patent does not lie. It's the same thingThe original sample that SIG submitted to the ATF what? 12 years ago , bares no semblance to what were being touted as arm braces in 2023.
None of those are SIGs original submission to the ATF. Not having ever seen anyone try to fire one that way maybe Im a bit confused. Ive only ever seen them used as stocks. Hey, why not drag out a video of a guy with a mangled arm and a bunch of tattoos using one like theyre "designed" to prove your point?Not having to register a firearm that they decide one day hurts their feelings.
You are seriously disgusting.
A flappy thing that goes around your arm on the end of a long tube? I'm no gynecologist but the patent does not lie. It's the same thingView attachment 676570View attachment 676571
That is the exact same design as what is in common use from sb tacticalNone of those are SIGs original submission to the ATF. Not having ever seen anyone try to fire one that way maybe Im a bit confused. Ive only ever seen them used as stocks. Hey, why not drag out a video of a guy with a mangled arm and a bunch of tattoos using one like theyre "designed" to prove your point?
Some pencil pusher at the ATF tech branch who probably got huge payola for signing off on those things doesnt have the legal authority to do that. Thats something a federal judge gets to decide. Learn nothing for WV v EPA?
View attachment 676576
Oh the common use thing. When has that been an effective ploy in a court of law? Tasers?That is the exact same design as what is in common use from sb tactical
Bored on an airplane