I had an opportunity to buy one of the most infamous handguns of the last 5 years, so I did it. Why? I was interested in these before the first gen was even released. I grew up with an Ortgies 7.62 in our arsenal, and it was a fun little gun to plink with. It was a colossal PITA to disassemble (I finally learned to do it inside a trash bag to catch the flying parts) but is was dead-on accurate up to 20 feet or so. The R51 was noted for using a Pedersen block, but the lines and 1911 style safety reminded me of the Ortgies. So for me, it was a nostalgia purchase.
For the TL;DR results skip to the last post.
The initial release of the firearm was a total disaster. The thing was a jam-o-matic that was eventually completely recalled. Production was moved from NC to AL and a second generation was quietly released. The new gen retailed for $400 or so, and was widely panned as being inferior to everything else in that price range.
Scouring the internet revealed these concerns from those who had already bought and shot one:
Won’t shoot steel case ammo
Hollow point ammo won’t feed
Jams after first shot if you shoot it 7+1
Jams (or FTF) on second shot routinely
Needs a 100 round break-in
Prefers 124 gr ammo or +P ammo
Magazine quality is low and needs user adjustments (trim legs on the bottom of the follower/trim coils off spring/replace spring with Glock spring)
I developed the following plan. My range doesn’t allow anything but brass ammo, and I didn’t have any hollow points so those issues would remain untested. I decided I would number the mags, and put them through a break-in process loading them/unloading them/repeat 20 times with at least 5 nights of resting under tension overnight. I would take the gun apart, take pictures of the parts so I could compare for wear and tear later, clean, lube, and reassemble. Then I would shoot 100 rounds of 124 gr ammo followed by 100 rounds of 115 gr ammo and track any jams or FTF. Boxes of 50 rounds meant I would shoot 6 mags from full at 7 rounds, and the 7th mag I would shoot as 7+1 (twice for each mag).
For the TL;DR results skip to the last post.
The initial release of the firearm was a total disaster. The thing was a jam-o-matic that was eventually completely recalled. Production was moved from NC to AL and a second generation was quietly released. The new gen retailed for $400 or so, and was widely panned as being inferior to everything else in that price range.
Scouring the internet revealed these concerns from those who had already bought and shot one:
Won’t shoot steel case ammo
Hollow point ammo won’t feed
Jams after first shot if you shoot it 7+1
Jams (or FTF) on second shot routinely
Needs a 100 round break-in
Prefers 124 gr ammo or +P ammo
Magazine quality is low and needs user adjustments (trim legs on the bottom of the follower/trim coils off spring/replace spring with Glock spring)
I developed the following plan. My range doesn’t allow anything but brass ammo, and I didn’t have any hollow points so those issues would remain untested. I decided I would number the mags, and put them through a break-in process loading them/unloading them/repeat 20 times with at least 5 nights of resting under tension overnight. I would take the gun apart, take pictures of the parts so I could compare for wear and tear later, clean, lube, and reassemble. Then I would shoot 100 rounds of 124 gr ammo followed by 100 rounds of 115 gr ammo and track any jams or FTF. Boxes of 50 rounds meant I would shoot 6 mags from full at 7 rounds, and the 7th mag I would shoot as 7+1 (twice for each mag).