The Blog. Not A Lie

OverMountainMan

Cryogenically Hardened Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
3,336
Location
NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Folks might run a across a guy that has a signature line that suggests differently. I wonder if he means ALL blogs, or just an unnamed one in particular. But, I suspect the unspoken meaning of the line is that anything not conforming to the state-approved narrative is somehow untrustworthy. Which, frankly, I think is obscene.

Here's an example to torpedo such blanket inanity: The Captain's Journal is certainly a blog. Herschel Smith is an Army Captain (Ret.) with a Marine Corps (current) son. He's also a North Carolinian, and his blog focuses mostly on guns and gun rights. So, no one needs to get their panties all a-bunch over it not being quarantined to Tortuga!

Currently celebrating his 12th year. Please consider putting The Captain's Journal in your regular weekly rotation. It's truly more honest than anything you'll find in the mainstream media.

The Captain's Journal. Not a lie.
 
Ol' Remus turns out an internet magazine, roughly on a weekly basis. A quote from his latest goes right to the heart of the FakeNews equation.-

art-remus-ident-04.jpg
The news media never disappoints in living down to its reputation, namely: lazy, sleazy liars.

First time I saw The Woodpile Report, I misinterpreted the title, as in wood-shed... as in taking some miscreants out behind a building where they could get their needed whuppin. It's wood-PILE, as in the collection of stuff that the hunters & gatherers have deposited in the middle of the community space for anyone's/everyone's edification.

This most recent Woodpile features a great article on the USS Constitution (hey, @RetiredUSNChief ), and chock full of otherwise entertaining and illuminating reportage.

uss-constitution.jpg


The Woodpile Report. Not a lie.
 
Ol' Remus turns out an internet magazine, roughly on a weekly basis. A quote from his latest goes right to the heart of the FakeNews equation.-

The news media never disappoints in living down to its reputation, namely: lazy, sleazy liars.

First time I saw The Woodpile Report, I misinterpreted the title, as in wood-shed... as in taking some miscreants out behind a building where they could get their needed whuppin. It's wood-PILE, as in the collection of stuff that the hunters & gatherers have deposited in the middle of the community space for anyone's/everyone's edification.

This most recent Woodpile features a great article on the USS Constitution (hey, @RetiredUSNChief ), and chock full of otherwise entertaining and illuminating reportage.

The Woodpile Report. Not a lie.


Ah, yes! The USS Constitution!

Actually, 6 frigates were commissioned to be built, but with a caveat that if peace with Algiers (where the Barbary Pirates were mostly from) was declared, construction would be halted. Peace was declared two years later, before any frigates were finished…but good ole George talked Congress into letting the three nearest completion be finished.

And that’s how we ended up with only three frigates: The USS Constitution (ordered 1 March 1794, launched 21 October 1797), the USS United States (ordered 27 March 1794, launched 10 May 1797), The USS Constellation, and the USS Constellation (ordered 27 March 1794, launched 7 September 1797).


And they were FAST frigates, too: an unusual design that had a long keel and narrow beam, along with an unusual design for her ribs, which were diagonal instead of vertical. The long, narrow design gave her impressive speed, while the diagonal ribs gave the hull greater strength.

On top of that, the design specified “Live Oak”, which is an evergreen Oak. These trees don’t grow straight and tall…they’re short with low hanging branches, which lends itself to grain patterns extremely well suited to make curved structural hull members of impressive strength due to the line of grain being perpendicular to the lines of stress.

Pop quiz time: How thick do you think the hull of these ships were?

Most people will seriously underestimate the hull thickness of wooden ships like these, because we just don’t see them being built any more. The USS Constitution’s hull was 21 inches thick. That’s 21 inches of OAK. How does this compare to a first line ship like the 104 gun HMS Victory or a Spanish galleon?

Well, the HMS Victory’s hull was 24 inches thick at the waterline. A Spanish galleon might have had hull thicknesses of 36 inches. So basically, the Constitution’s hull was nearly as thick as the British’s Victory…and the Constitution was faster.

Now…imagine trying to get a cannonball to penetrate that much Oak. Yes, it was not unusual for cannonballs to literally bounce off the hull of such ships…and the British did, in fact, document just this happening when they shot at the Constitution.

As a side note…battles between such ships weren’t conducted to sink the ships. Rather the goal was to take down rigging and masts, reducing or eliminating the ship’s ability to maneuver and sail away. In effect, render them dead in the water. Without the ability to maneuver or sail away, an enemy ship could easily decimate the ship or conduct boarding operations with little, if any, consequences to themselves. They could, for example, sail across the aft end of such a ship and fire a sequential volley of cannon shots through the thinner, weaker aft hull, basically strafing the entire length of the interior of the ship with cannon fire, pretty much killing the entire crew belowdecks with the resulting wooden shrapnel (which is what “shivered timbers” is…explosive wooden shrapnel caused by a cannonball).

So, basically, the USS Constitution was faster and stronger hulled than British ships of the line and armed with some serious firepower to back it up.
 
By the way...up until the advent of the heavy frigate in about 1785, 18 pounders were the biggest guns frigates carried...24 pounders were too heavy.

USS Constitution (44-gun frigate rating, but often carried more than 50) armament:

30 - 24 pounders (long guns)
20 - 32 pounders
2 - 24 pounders (bow chasers)

So the USS Constitution's firepower seriously outmatched that of all other frigates on the high seas except the heavy frigates. by example, the Brtish heavy frigates of the time carried 24 pounders...and were converted from other ships of the line, with fewer and smaller guns.

For example, the Razees:

26 - 24 pounders (long guns)
8 - 12 pounders
4 - 32 pounders (on the forecastle)

So the USS Constitution SERIOUSLY outclassed the British Heavy Frigates of the time...faster, stronger hulled, better armed.

And the Constitution could go toe-to-toe with the bigger ships of the line, as well...and did. Because, you know...faster and stronger hulled and plenty of firepower to boot, giving the Constitution AT LEAST as much range as most of the bigger ships of the line with her 32 pounders.

If that had built larger ships along the same design strategy, they would have been truly frightening...but these fast frigates were PERFECT for the fledgling nation we were at the time. Much more affordable than larger, more costly ships would have been and much meaner than anything else on the high seas of any comparable class.
 
Hull thickness is comparable with WWII battleships. Same thickness, different material. I once read that the physics showed that the Constitution could withstand more from her opponents than WWII battleships could from theirs.

I always dreamed of trying to get duty aboard. They love reservists, too, and heard it was a great 2-week duty.
 
I see the top blog on Herschel's site today, http://www.captainsjournal.com/2018/06/13/chicago-police-raid-wrong-home-on-south-side/ is the sort of thing that would be bound to stir up controversy here. Or more specifically, how he thinks "no knock" raids should be dealt with and the ideal outcome.


I'd not sure I would say "should" happen on any no knock raid, but if the wrong house is chosen and the homeowner takes these appropriate steps to protect their home , that homeowner SHOULD incur no absolutely no penalty.

Right now, there is no penalty for such police incompetence.
 
Ah, yes! The USS Constitution!

Actually, 6 frigates were commissioned to be built, but with a caveat that if peace with Algiers (where the Barbary Pirates were mostly from) was declared, construction would be halted. Peace was declared two years later, before any frigates were finished…but good ole George talked Congress into letting the three nearest completion be finished.

And that’s how we ended up with only three frigates: The USS Constitution (ordered 1 March 1794, launched 21 October 1797), the USS United States (ordered 27 March 1794, launched 10 May 1797), The USS Constellation, and the USS Constellation (ordered 27 March 1794, launched 7 September 1797).


And they were FAST frigates, too: an unusual design that had a long keel and narrow beam, along with an unusual design for her ribs, which were diagonal instead of vertical. The long, narrow design gave her impressive speed, while the diagonal ribs gave the hull greater strength.

On top of that, the design specified “Live Oak”, which is an evergreen Oak. These trees don’t grow straight and tall…they’re short with low hanging branches, which lends itself to grain patterns extremely well suited to make curved structural hull members of impressive strength due to the line of grain being perpendicular to the lines of stress.

Pop quiz time: How thick do you think the hull of these ships were?

Most people will seriously underestimate the hull thickness of wooden ships like these, because we just don’t see them being built any more. The USS Constitution’s hull was 21 inches thick. That’s 21 inches of OAK. How does this compare to a first line ship like the 104 gun HMS Victory or a Spanish galleon?

Well, the HMS Victory’s hull was 24 inches thick at the waterline. A Spanish galleon might have had hull thicknesses of 36 inches. So basically, the Constitution’s hull was nearly as thick as the British’s Victory…and the Constitution was faster.

Now…imagine trying to get a cannonball to penetrate that much Oak. Yes, it was not unusual for cannonballs to literally bounce off the hull of such ships…and the British did, in fact, document just this happening when they shot at the Constitution.

As a side note…battles between such ships weren’t conducted to sink the ships. Rather the goal was to take down rigging and masts, reducing or eliminating the ship’s ability to maneuver and sail away. In effect, render them dead in the water. Without the ability to maneuver or sail away, an enemy ship could easily decimate the ship or conduct boarding operations with little, if any, consequences to themselves. They could, for example, sail across the aft end of such a ship and fire a sequential volley of cannon shots through the thinner, weaker aft hull, basically strafing the entire length of the interior of the ship with cannon fire, pretty much killing the entire crew belowdecks with the resulting wooden shrapnel (which is what “shivered timbers” is…explosive wooden shrapnel caused by a cannonball).

So, basically, the USS Constitution was faster and stronger hulled than British ships of the line and armed with some serious firepower to back it up.
That's dropping some knowledge bombs, Chief. Thanks.
 
Hull thickness is comparable with WWII battleships. Same thickness, different material. I once read that the physics showed that the Constitution could withstand more from her opponents than WWII battleships could from theirs.

I always dreamed of trying to get duty aboard. They love reservists, too, and heard it was a great 2-week duty.
It would be great to get to crew on one of those leg-stretching excursions, but I bet you've got to be mighty well-heeled for that list.
 
Hey kids, here's another installment of NotALieBlog.

I've followed the Z-Man's writing for a few years now, and have heard zero Pinocchio-worthy statements from him. A Social Justice Warrior, however, would not have to dig hard there to find something to set their hair afire.

Hot off the presses, here's a great episode of the Z-Blog Power Hour podcast, to whet your appetite. Everything you ever wanted to know about the "Dissident Right".



Z Blog: Not a lie.
 
Back
Top Bottom