Ok, so he's looking at his phone with rifle in hand and it's pointed downrange.
You can see it's in battery, but is the safety on?
There is no finger on the trigger, so it cant just fire at random and it IS pointed in a safe direction (assuming 'hot range' since he's holding the rifle).
Im sure that's what Geezer is alluding to, but, honestly, I dont see a huge problem with it. Again, finger not on trigger, we dont know if it's on safe or not, and it's pointed downrange
Optic’s back’ards.
That was my first thought as well. Prohibited items in my house!Nike shoes !
Maybe the scope ISN’T backwards. Perhaps he’s holding the firearm backwards.
I'm beginning to understand the pictures of your targets.Maybe the scope ISN’T backwards. Perhaps he’s holding the firearm backwards.
I'm beginning to understand the pictures of your targets.
He is using Strelok to calculate MILs in reverse so he can actually see brain matter thru the pupil with that optic in microscope configuration. I think hes searching in vain.
Plot twist: optics companies start putting directional arrows on their tactical lines
At least the backwards scope is on a stupid riser getup that is way too high.
No kidding! I wonder if his chin will even touch the stock with that get-up
He did that to clear the front sight.
He's calling Jose'
to ask why the scope isn't magnifying. Cause Larry's an expert on anything guns.
How else do you verify it’s safe?
How else do you verify it’s safe?
my favorite 25 yard sight-in target of all time
What's Wrong With This Picture?
No old guy has swept in to pick up brass yet