Yes, they do want to take your guns..

rufrdr

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2018
Messages
4,243
Location
Willow Spring
Rating - 100%
81   0   0
https://www.bakersfield.com/news/we...cle_0cb33564-3081-11e9-8a33-df2a569d1fdd.html

This got a lot of play in California when the raid happened but now it appears it was all a 'mistake'. This time they took on an owner who had the resources to fight back. Many don't and have to do a plea to avoid jail time even though they are innocent.

Superior Court Judge John S. Somers on Wednesday, during a hearing that could have statewide ramifications, ruled the evidence seized from Kirschenmann's home is inadmissible because the warrant was based on false information.

During the hearing it came to light, in an admission both the defense and prosecution found shocking, that the agents who conduct these searches aren't given electronic access by the Department of Justice to applications filed by gun owners.

The charges against Kirschenmann are expected to be dismissed Friday.

The error contained in the warrant, Staiger said, has to do with the chronology of when the weapon in question was compliant with the law. He said a mistake was made because the Department of Justice does not entrust its own agents with access to gun ownership applications.


WoW!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Imagine the real criminal activity that was ignored while these guys were fooling around. :mad:

What’s a bullet button?
 
One more reason we need "loser pays" in our courts. This kind of thing will continue as long as the government and/or private citizens are allowed to play the "legal lottery" with our constitutional rights. The defendant in this case should, upon dismissal, should have all weapons immediately returned, a check written for his legal costs and time spent on his defense at a set rate, say $40 an hour, and then there should be punitive damages for the negative publicity and damage to his character.

People say that "Loser pays" will interfere with the "little guy's" ability to fight back, well then have the attorneys carry insurance for it. If they pay out too many times because they take bad cases hoping for a favorable ruling, their premiums will increase and they will be out business. Problem solved and the little guy is represented, if he has a case.

Violation of public trust by law enforcement and politicians should carry some of the most significant penalties in our civil court system. Money tends to make even the government think twice if the number is significant.

The prosecutor even said, "the outcome was anticipated". Then why the he** did he take it to court. That statements should cost his office BIG BUCKS!!!
 
Last edited:
Check this video out from CA, this guy learned the hard way where registration leads to

 
Last edited:
Imagine the real criminal activity that was ignored while these guys were fooling around. :mad:

What’s a bullet button?

IT takes the place of a mag release and makes mag changes slower. IIRC you have to push something pointy in the space to release the mag. Like a bullet.
 
Huh....two cases in as many days where demonstrably false information was used by authorities to obtain a warrant to violate the Rights of the innocent.

At least they didn't kill the home owners, I guess.

At some point, you have to question the integrity of the entire"justice" system, ad these cases are not rare, are not isolated, and are getting more Citizens and cops killed.
 
IT takes the place of a mag release and makes mag changes slower. IIRC you have to push something pointy in the space to release the mag. Like a bullet.
In that case, I’m really confused...

Kirschenmann's case has its origins in California's 2016 ban on bullet buttons, which are devices used to release a magazine from a gun.
 
Last edited:
In that case, I’m really confused...

Kirschenmann's case has its origins in California's 2016 ban on bullet buttons, which are devices used to release a magazine from a gun.
If I understand it correctly, the magazine stays attached and you have to reload it in place rather than exchange it for a full one.

As if it’s not easy to defeat and anyone who plans to commit mass murder is going to obey that idiodic piece of librul dung.
 
Last edited:
"Kirschenmann owned an assault pistol..."

What in the hell is an assault pistol?

Never mind....it's too early to get the blood pressure up
Funny considering your screen name...
images

Mini Draco
 
Last edited:
In that case, I’m really confused...

Kirschenmann's case has its origins in California's 2016 ban on bullet buttons, which are devices used to release a magazine from a gun.

Bullet button came first. Then they banned them too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom