Kyle Rittenhouse 17 year Old Shoots 3 kills 2....

I posted this in one of the restricted areas but I know some don’t go there so I figure I’d share this info here as well.

Keeps getting better, the first guy he shot was a registered pedophile, the skate boarder was a multi time woman beater and the guy with the handgun was a felon who legally isn’t allowed to poses any firearm.
 
The meek attitudes expressed in this thread make it clear why the country is in shambles now. Anyone of adult age by 1985 or so: Gun control of the 80s and 90s was your failure. The schools teaching communist ideology. The loss of American principles and values... all your failure. Shame on you.

And now you preach your platitudes once again.
You’re pretty new here, prepare to be disappointed a lot. There’s plenty of freedom loving people here but also plenty who applaud when Trump passes gun control just because there’s an R beside his name.
 
I posted this in one of the restricted areas but I know some don’t go there so I figure I’d share this info here as well.

Keeps getting better, the first guy he shot was a registered pedophile, the skate boarder was a multi time woman beater and the guy with the handgun was a felon who legally isn’t allowed to poses any firearm.

Screenshot_20200827-071542.png
 
I posted this in one of the restricted areas but I know some don’t go there so I figure I’d share this info here as well.

Keeps getting better, the first guy he shot was a registered pedophile, the skate boarder was a multi time woman beater and the guy with the handgun was a felon who legally isn’t allowed to poses any firearm.
Took out the trash !
 
The meek attitudes expressed in this thread make it clear why the country is in shambles now. Anyone of adult age by 1985 or so: Gun control of the 80s and 90s was your failure. The schools teaching communist ideology. The loss of American principles and values... all your failure. Shame on you.

And now you preach your platitudes once again.

The baby boomers get blamed for raising the millennials. Guess who raised the baby boomers? The greatest generation. There’s a cycle. Hard men foster good times, good times foster soft men, soft men foster hard times, etc, so on and so forth, blah blah.

It’s human nature.

We couldn't carry constitutionally, or concealed in many states 20-30 years ago, and now increasingly we can. Is gun control on the cusp of something bad? Maybe. Probably. This is an old gif, but I like it.

Peddle your guilt elsewhere.

upload_2020-8-27_7-48-12.gif
 
Last edited:
People say the boy should not have been where he was. The same applies to the people he shot.

I get the idea he was with some people trying to put out a fire the maggots had started when more maggots attacked. I have not heard anything that suggests that he acted offensively at any time.
 
Last edited:
Keeps getting better, the first guy he shot was a registered pedophile, the skate boarder was a multi time woman beater and the guy with the handgun was a felon who legally isn’t allowed to poses any firearm.

Pedophile dead...good

Woman beater dead...won’t beat another female again...good

3rd dude....”Lefty”...that’s what happens when you point a weapon at someone else who has a weapon and a faster trigger finger.

When is this kid getting his citation / humanitarian service award?
 
I posted this in one of the restricted areas but I know some don’t go there so I figure I’d share this info here as well.

Keeps getting better, the first guy he shot was a registered pedophile, the skate boarder was a multi time woman beater and the guy with the handgun was a felon who legally isn’t allowed to poses any firearm.

is the mayor going to give him a community service award?

im writing email right now to gofundme.com, fundly.com and others that took down crowd funding for his legal case.


Now I can add in that GFM supports pedophiles and domestic abusers :) start playing the hyperbolic claim game that they love so much.
 
I want to hate on the first guy for his contact with a minor conviction... but it happened in 2002 and he would be 36 today.
That puts him right at 18...
Now I hear from friends, no personal experience myself, naturally, that when you're 18/19 and out on your own with a car and an apartment, sometimes those 16/17 girls just start showing up and won't leave you alone. It's entirely possible that's all it was and that the whole "pedophile" thing doesn't apply.
Can't we just hate him and be glad he's dead for the acts he did that lead to his very timely demise?
 
They are adding that in order to attempt to show he knew he had broken the law. It does not work in his favor that he did not turn himself in. Even if the shooting was justified you don't just drive home and get into your PJs and go to sleep after shooting 3 people on a public street.
He shot 3 communist shitbags that needed killing. A pedophile, a woman beater, and a felon to boot. He should be able to sleep like a baby knowing he did what was right for America.
 
I posted this in one of the restricted areas but I know some don’t go there so I figure I’d share this info here as well.

Keeps getting better, the first guy he shot was a registered pedophile, the skate boarder was a multi time woman beater and the guy with the handgun was a felon who legally isn’t allowed to poses any firearm.
What did the 3rd guy do to become a felon? If its because he had a baggie of grass, he shouldn't have become a felon.
That being said, putting a gun in someone's face holding a weapon is an excellent way to lose meat.
 
Last edited:
We have another thread on here about this (mods, can you merge?). I mentioned there that on some nationwide social media sites they are reporting the booger-eaters' GFM for fraud (from criminal enterprise) and shutting them down. I would not be surprised if they shut his down; that said, if I could I would underwrite his defense. he needs all the help he can get. Also on another forum (M4C I think) they have posted the DA's contact info and are attempting to flood his office with, ah, support for the lad.
 
I posted this in one of the restricted areas but I know some don’t go there so I figure I’d share this info here as well.

Keeps getting better, the first guy he shot was a registered pedophile, the skate boarder was a multi time woman beater and the guy with the handgun was a felon who legally isn’t allowed to poses any firearm.

So what you're saying is, a pedophile, a domestic abuser, and a drunk felon communist walk into an AR....

 
Some have said it already but he committed crimes by possessing a rifle in WI among other things like open carry. I know you say show me in the constitution but that really does not matter it will be the state law that is looked at and used to charge him. The facts are he broke laws before he used deadly force to protect himself. In most states you give up your right to use deadly force if you are in fact in the process of committing a crime yourself. I know that is the case in NC bet it is in WI to. Will he eventually get off in the higher courts maybe but he has a long and expensive road ahead of him.

We will also see more of this. People are getting tired and when it comes to their neighborhood there will be actions. We all have a long road ahead of us.
 
Last edited:
We have another thread on here about this (mods, can you merge?). I mentioned there that on some nationwide social media sites they are reporting the booger-eaters' GFM for fraud (from criminal enterprise) and shutting them down. I would not be surprised if they shut his down; that said, if I could I would underwrite his defense. he needs all the help he can get. Also on another forum (M4C I think) they have posted the DA's contact info and are attempting to flood his office with, ah, support for the lad.

all ones I'm aware of for Kyle were taken down already. one was at 50k (fundly I believe). not even an hour later I was going back to make an account and donate and already didn't exist. wild.
 
Some have said it already but he committed crimes by possessing a rifle in WI among other things like open carry. I know you say show me in the constitution but that really does not matter it will be the state law that is looked at and used to charge him. The facts are he broke laws before he used deadly force to protect himself. In most states you give up your right to use deadly force if you are in fact in the process of committing a crime yourself. I know that is the case in NC bet it is in WI to. Will he eventually get off in the higher courts maybe but he has a long and expensive road ahead of him.

We will also see more of this. People are getting tired and when it comes to their neighborhood there will be actions. We all have a long road ahead of us.

Someone already looked into in either this thread or the other one...that crime is only a misdemeanor.
 
We have another thread on here about this (mods, can you merge?).
The other ones are in sections some people don’t have access to. This one has stayed semi-civil, so we can leave it in the open for now.
 
Someone already looked into in either this thread or the other one...that crime is only a misdemeanor.

It is going to be long, expensive and messy.

Here is the WI law on prevocation

939.48  Self-defense and defense of others.
Provocation affects the privilege of self-defense as follows:
(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.

Did he provoke them by carrying a gun to a protest (riot)? Guess a jury will decide that. Did he try to withdraw and his only option was to defend himself? Again a jury will decide that.

I still wonder why he went home and why the police let him go home. It all seems a bit funny? Maybe a red flag to use against 2A
 
Some have said it already but he committed crimes by possessing a rifle in WI among other things like open carry. I know you say show me in the constitution but that really does not matter it will be the state law that is looked at and used to charge him. The facts are he broke laws before he used deadly force to protect himself. In most states you give up your right to use deadly force if you are in fact in the process of committing a crime yourself. I know that is the case in NC bet it is in WI to. Will he eventually get off in the higher courts maybe but he has a long and expensive road ahead of him.

We will also see more of this. People are getting tired and when it comes to their neighborhood there will be actions. We all have a long road ahead of us.

Wisconsin Statutes 939.48 - Self-defense and defense of others.
(1m)(2) Provocation affects the privilege of self-defense as follows:
(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.
(b) The privilege lost by provocation may be regained if the actor in good faith withdraws from the fight and gives adequate notice thereof to his or her assailant.​

The courts have already been clear about "withdraws from the fight" and jogging a long way down a street would appear to easily qualify.

Being on your back on the ground with people attacking you would also appear to easily qualify as "exhausted every other reasonable means to escape."
 
Last edited:
What did the 3rd guy do to become a felon? If its because he had a baggie of grass, he shouldn't have become a felon.
That being said, putting a gun in someone's face holding a weapon is an excellent way to lose meat.
B&E and theft. Looks like he robbed a house and stole a car from what I saw.
 
Well this is rich....a quote from Sheriff regarding citizenry handling the situation(s) that our governments and/or police clearly are NOT...

"The sheriff called it a 'scary thought' that untrained members of the public might ever be given the same duties or privileges as police. 'Oh, hell no. What a scary, scary thought that would be in my world,' he said."

Lets be fair here for a moment...given many recent events (yes magnified and amplified no doubt) and events of the past involving police shooting, this "untrained" individual exercised textbook perfect use of lethal force (particularly including the minimum necessary lethal force) with incredible on target accuracy.

The irony here being that we are IN THIS MESS because of recent UNjustified uses of deadly force. George Floyd case almost certainly being the case of improper training or application of a dangerous technique resulting in negligent homicide. and who can forget the thousands and thousands of rounds that missed their target at the hands of police. Im pro police, don't get me wrong, but I'm pro transparent truth, fact and/or evidence first. And this Sheriff stinks of the obfuscation of truth variety.

Another disclaimer: I do NOT blame police for the 'I don't get paid enough for this crap' mentality...AT ALL. in fact I'm all for it. But to be so snobbish as to project your own failure onto the citizenry that has yet to even be given the chance to fail is irritating. It reminds me of the "magical healthcare worker properties" of masks from the early pandemic mantra. Remember that? lol. we all SHOULD wear masks now (which I support), yet 4 months ago masks didn't work unless nurse of physician...
 
Some have said it already but he committed crimes by possessing a rifle in WI among other things like open carry. I know you say show me in the constitution but that really does not matter it will be the state law that is looked at and used to charge him. The facts are he broke laws before he used deadly force to protect himself. In most states you give up your right to use deadly force if you are in fact in the process of committing a crime yourself. I know that is the case in NC bet it is in WI to. Will he eventually get off in the higher courts maybe but he has a long and expensive road ahead of him.

We will also see more of this. People are getting tired and when it comes to their neighborhood there will be actions. We all have a long road ahead of us.

Nullify
 
Wisconsin Statutes 939.48 - Self-defense and defense of others.
(1m)(2) Provocation affects the privilege of self-defense as follows:
(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.
(b) The privilege lost by provocation may be regained if the actor in good faith withdraws from the fight and gives adequate notice thereof to his or her assailant.​

The courts have already been clear about "withdraws from the fight" and jogging a long way down a street would appear to easily qualify.

Being on your back on the ground with people attacking you would also appear to easily qualify as "exhausted every other reasonable means to escape."

Posted the same thing just before you posted this. As I said in that post will be up to a jury to decide if he was justified. At a minimum I would guess a grand jury. But the protesters will force a trial at a minimum or they will riot more.
 
I have to wonder, were they out protesting again last night in honor of their fallen komrads?
I saw that the guv authorized 250 more troops deployed, and another curfew set but no news of anything else.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 
I have to wonder, were they out protesting again last night in honor of their fallen komrads?
I saw that the guv authorized 250 more troops deployed, and another curfew set but no news of anything else.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Was reported on ABC News this a.m. as having been a quiet night. So the left thinks it was okay whatever actually happened.
 
Well this is rich....a quote from Sheriff regarding citizenry handling the situation(s) that our governments and/or police clearly are NOT...

"The sheriff called it a 'scary thought' that untrained members of the public might ever be given the same duties or privileges as police. 'Oh, hell no. What a scary, scary thought that would be in my world,' he said."

I watched the press conference yesterday.
The sheriff said that the group the kid was with had contacted his office asking to be deputized prior to the events of that evening. That's what made the sheriff react with that quote posted.

In nearly the same breath he also praised the BLM movement, and stated he kneeled with the protestors. I'm not sure if the good sheriff believes in their movement or is just quick to cave to the mob in some effort to maintain "peace" or following orders from his superiors. My read on him says he's a totalitarian though.
 
Last edited:
The notion that is apparently being started by the left is the skateboard guy is a hero for trying to stop the shooter from killing many, many more.

.
 
The meek attitudes expressed in this thread make it clear why the country is in shambles now. Anyone of adult age by 1985 or so: Gun control of the 80s and 90s was your failure. The schools teaching communist ideology. The loss of American principles and values... all your failure. Shame on you.

And now you preach your platitudes once again.


Easy to pass the blame. All that stuff is moot. What matters is now. What matters is who is going to do what now. The present enemy is what needs to be defeated. Pointing fingers gets nothing.
 
It is going to be long, expensive and messy.

Here is the WI law on prevocation

939.48  Self-defense and defense of others.
Provocation affects the privilege of self-defense as follows:
(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.

Did he provoke them by carrying a gun to a protest (riot)? Guess a jury will decide that. Did he try to withdraw and his only option was to defend himself? Again a jury will decide that.

I still wonder why he went home and why the police let him go home. It all seems a bit funny? Maybe a red flag to use against 2A

The "privilege" of self defense?

You have the Right to Life. Logic and reason dictate if you have the unalienable Right to Live, you logically and reasonably have the unalienable Right to protect and preserve that Life.

That statute is immoral and unconstitutional prima facie.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom