US Marshal's Service...big 'oopsie'

And I'm allowed, as a 100% law abiding property owner, to assume that armed trespassers have bad intentions toward me. Can you not see how this could go wrong? or does that not enter into the thought process?
Of course it does, every day - some of you are sounding like this a new thing. These are the dangers of policework. Chasing shooting or stabbing suspects in the South Bronx on fire escapes, etc, in plainclothes - or should we just have said, wow, he made it to someone's backyard or a fire escape - he's home free, shouldn't chase him there?
 
This is a gun form in the south land. You're not gonna get a much more friendly audience than this. THIS IS HOW BAD YOUR PR IS.
PR? There doesn't appear to be too many people as anti-cop and unwilling to listen to a professional point of view as you. I don't know what you do for a living, but I sure wouldn't tell you how to do it.
 
PR? There doesn't appear to be too many people as anti-cop and unwilling to listen to a professional point of view as you. I don't know what you do for a living, but I sure wouldn't tell you how to do it.
I don't understand why I can't swing rifles around while trespassing?
 
How do we know that they didn't do that for 2 weeks already? And other issues discussed in this thread already.
Cause if they did, they would have realised that the wanted individual was/has not been there. But thats not really the issue. The issue is coming in all incognito
 
I don't understand why I can't swing rifles around while trespassing?
More ignorance. Define Trespassing in N. Carolina. If you were tasked with looking for a murder suspect, where would YOU have your rifle?
 
Or why would anyone think the fugitive was the actual owner of the house? Property records are useless.
Well property records would lead you to the owner who could tell you the name of their tenant.....

Hell give me any address in NC and I can likely tell you the owner and the owners address (if different) in less than 15 minutes. GIS is an amazing (and somewhat scary) thing....
 
It's common. It's normal, everyday policework.
Therein lies the rub....It most certainly is NOT common here. I think that might be the center of your opinion. I live in a county that is larger than the State of RI. Cops of towns, cities and the County Police and Sherriff's Dept DO NOT do this here on a regular basis. Do you even Think that might make a difference to us? Again, your thoughts are from your life's experiences...they do not apply Here. This not only doesn't happen every shift, I'd venture a bet it doesn't happen once a WEEK.
So some one here will Not be Used to seeing Police armed with toboggans and masks.
Try again with this info....
 
One person's word about where a murder suspect might live in no way makes this reasonable. A reasonable department would do this thing called a stake out.
And you learned that from your experience from . . . . .
 
Cause if they did, they would have realised that the wanted individual was/has not been there. But thats not really the issue. The issue is coming in all incognito
So, you feel that with each anonymous and unverified telephone tip, police should spend countless man hours, helicopter fuel, K9's, etc. sitting on houses - I hear you, but it's not realistic.
 
I'm a cop and drive around and write tickets for a living, to individuals who are dangerous to the public.
If I pull you over while I am dressed like a thug and write a ticket you are not deserving of:

You have no right to complain because you never write tickets. Leave it to the experts. Just be glad I didn't kill you.
 
Therein lies the rub....It most certainly is NOT common here. I think that might be the center of your opinion. I live in a county that is larger than the State of RI. Cops of towns, cities and the County Police and Sherriff's Dept DO NOT do this here on a regular basis. Do you even Think that might make a difference to us? Again, your thoughts are from your life's experiences...they do not apply Here. This not only doesn't happen every shift, I'd venture a bet it doesn't happen once a WEEK.
So some one here will Not be Used to seeing Police armed with toboggans and masks.
Try again with this info....
So how do officers look for murder suspects in N. Carolina?
 
So how do officers look for murder suspects in N. Carolina?

They should dress like non-cops and go door to door taping over peoples cameras and surrounding their houses and trespassing.... to avoid costing people money?
 
Last edited:
If I pull you over while I am dressed like a thug
You gotta get smart and do some undercover work, you can outright commit crimes if needs must, and the badge makes it all good. It all falls under the 'cops do it every day so it's all good' clause of the Constitution.
 
So, you feel that with each anonymous and unverified telephone tip, police should spend countless man hours, helicopter fuel, K9's, etc. sitting on houses - I hear you, but it's not realistic.

Why look into verifying tips when we can just put on masks and wave guns around in people's back yard
 
They should dress like non-cops and go door to door taping over peoples cameras and surrounding their houses and trespassing.... to avoid costing people money?
If you're keeping up, I acknowledged their garb to be horrible for their mission. But you didn't answer the question. Someone kills your loved one and a tip says he's in a house - what should the police do? Wait outside? For how long? How long will that last without the surveillance being "made" - 30 seconds? So the guy doesn't come out. How long do the police wait? "Sorry Mr. NKD, we waited 12 hours and your family member's murderer never came out - so we went home."
 
Well, we can't really skirt the legal issues if we call it a search now, can we? ;)

I'm glad we cleared up this little pedantic point about how they were just looking for, but legally definitely not searching for a suspect.
Legally, "search" has different meanings in different circumstances. One form of search is Constitutionally protected when it involves a person or enclosed spaces they control. Another form of search is not Constitutionally protected when it involves observing what is publicly visible.

Why look into verifying tips when we can just put on masks and wave guns around in people's back yard
@Dan0311 and I would both appreciate it if you would quote the right person when you reply to a post.
 
That's a good question. I would think it could scare a reasonable person. That said no one tried to enter the residence. So a reasonable person would not be able to legally just start shooting. I do understand were it's possible with the world we live in right now a completely innocent person opening fire. That being said I simply don't think a reasonable response would be to simply start shooting. If it happens you would be charged and have to go to court. You probably would have an up hill battle. There was a recent case from texas (iirc) that turned out on the good side for the homeowner and I'm glad it did. But people need to understand that both sides are just doing what they can to be safe at the moment. This situation is total BS it was a knock and talk for a violent murder suspect.
This^^^^a thoughtful , reasoned, Gentlemanly Answer. At my stage of life, I have only My life's experiences to draw from. A retired N.Y. Police Officer and I will never understand each other. This conversation simply reinforces my opinion. Best to just keep our distance.
 
So, you feel that with each anonymous and unverified telephone tip, police should spend countless man hours, helicopter fuel, K9's, etc. sitting on houses - I hear you, but it's not realistic.
Really, helicopters hoovering over house for surveillance? K9s out front for surveillance….how did they ever do it back in the day🙄
 
Legally, "search" has different meanings in different circumstances. One form of search is Constitutionally protected when it involves a person or enclosed spaces they control. Another form of search is not Constitutionally protected when it involves observing what is publicly visible.

I don't disagree, and would like to think I've got a fair grasp of the difference. My issue is that it's largely a differentiation of petty semantics. Police are by no means allowed to search you without probable cause or a warrant proper, but now if they want to show up and take a site seeing field trip uninvited onto your property on some vague and shady pretext, that's just ordinary police business.
 
I want to start by saying I am not anti LE or anything. I have a cousin who is retired HP and has been police chief. Few friends are deputies. And on occasion I interact with LE for work. Even Monday the GPD officer shot saw alot of plain clothes officers then. Even 1 guy got out of a jeep GC jeans and a blue UA shirt walked to the back of the jeep and put on vest to go into the hospital still looked more professional than the picture of these 2.
As someone who doesn't use my front door. If someone is knocking on the front claiming to be police or us marshal or anything. But then I see purple beanie lurking out back. I can't say for certain I'm pulling the trigger but I will damn sure be ready. Bc that is trespassing and fear for my life.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 
This^^^^a thoughtful , reasoned, Gentlemanly Answer. At my stage of life, I have only My life's experiences to draw from. A retired N.Y. Police Officer
and I will never understand each other. This conversation simply reinforces my opinion. Best to just keep our distance.
I am truly trying to understand. There are many intelligent people on this forum and I'm certainly willing to hear things out and learn. I was known to have a higher threshold of probable cause and it's got me in trouble with my boss' who have a heavy pro-arrest policy. My main question was, "If the Marshal's did it wrong, what's the 'correct' way?" If waiting down the block and conducting surveillance is the only answer, than that's it. Extremely unrealistic and a waste of time in many cases, but it is what it is.
Really, helicopters hoovering over house for surveillance? K9s out front for surveillance….how did they ever do it back in the day🙄
Back in MY day I started with a .38 and 18 total rounds. My tiny precinct covered 1.9 sq, miles and we had 92 homicides my first year.

THESE days, when you go after a murderer, you try to use better tactics and equipment.
 
Last edited:
I be chicken little. I just let the meanest Doberman out to see what is what. When she bites one in the jewels, I hope he has protection. She is an old gal, but has plenty of bite em there experience from living in Texas. If they kill my pup, time to hose em down. Don't need black tip with .300 WinMag😁
 
If wondering around on my back deck ain't trespassing, nothing is
In North Carolina, trespassing is as follows:
NC General Statutes - Chapter 14 Article 22B - First and Second Degree Trespass.

§ 14-159.11. Definition.
As used in this Article, "building" means any structure or part of a structure, other than a conveyance, enclosed so as to permit reasonable entry only through a door and roofed to protect it from the elements.

§ 14-159.12. First degree trespass.
(a) Offense. – A person commits the offense of first degree trespass if, without authorization, he enters or remains:
(1) On premises of another so enclosed or secured as to demonstrate clearly an intent to keep out intruders;
(2) In a building of another

§ 14-159.13. Second degree trespass.
(a) Offense. – A person commits the offense of second degree trespass if, without authorization, he enters or remains on premises of another:
(1) After he has been notified not to enter or remain there by the owner, by a person in charge of the premises, by a lawful occupant, or by another authorized person; or
(2) That are posted, in a manner reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders, with notice not to enter the premises.
Wandering around on your deck is probably not trespassing if your deck does not have a gate and roof or if the deck (or the property it is on) is not posted.
 
If you're keeping up, I acknowledged their garb to be horrible for their mission. But you didn't answer the question. Someone kills your loved one and a tip says he's in a house - what should the police do? Wait outside? For how long? How long will that last without the surveillance being "made" - 30 seconds? So the guy doesn't come out. How long do the police wait? "Sorry Mr. NKD, we waited 12 hours and your family member's murderer never came out - so we went home."
They're idiots but I don't like how people are getting mad about police being idiots?
In North Carolina, trespassing is as follows:

Wandering around on your deck is probably not trespassing if your deck does not have a gate and roof or if the deck (or the property it is on) is not posted.
Cool, I'll have my rifle out when I come to tell you about my Tupperware at your back door
 
helicopter fuel, K9's, etc. sitting on houses - I hear you, but it's not realistic.

TF you need a helicopter for? Or even a K9 for that matter to sit on a house.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 
I don't disagree, and would like to think I've got a fair grasp of the difference. My issue is that it's largely a differentiation of petty semantics. Police are by no means allowed to search you without probable cause or a warrant proper, but now if they want to show up and take a site seeing field trip uninvited onto your property on some vague and shady pretext, that's just ordinary police business.
Not saying it's good or bad, but unless your property is posted, police can roam around on your property like anyone else.
 
TF you need a helicopter for? Or even a K9 for that matter to sit on a house.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
"MURDER SUSPECT". They run. Usually much, much fast than the police do. They usually have guns. They often hide to ambush......
 
Last edited:
Not saying it's good or bad, but unless your property is posted, police can roam around on your property like anyone else.

Nothing to contest on my part concerning that, my point was to the rather fickle and irrational nature of the interpretation of the Constitution as concerns warranted searches vs. warrantless 'visits'.
 
They're idiots but I don't like how people are getting mad about police being idiots?

Cool, I'll have my rifle out when I come to tell you about my Tupperware at your back door

You kinda' lost me. I don't mind witty banter as long as I'm following. I'm not. Let's me and you just call it a day from replies to each other, I'm getting nothing positive out of it.
 
Nothing to contest on my part concerning that, my point was to the rather fickle and irrational nature of the interpretation of the Constitution as concerns warranted searches vs. warrantless 'visits'.
I think decades of case law has really made most of this quite clear, even in liberal meccas like NY.
 
"MURDER SUSPECT". They run. Usually much, much fast than the police do. They usually have guns. They often hide to ambush......
Ah. See there's a doughnut joke to be made there for sure. Next what the murderer is young and black bc fat white guys don't murder. They just the lazy cop that instead of stay in shape for their job which can include the chasing of suspect ah F the PT today we got the helicopter

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom