Need to ask yourself, is it worth it? Especially these days?Spray sounds like the best option, but even then do you end up in court for pepper spraying a beaten pregnant woman.
Yeah, that's what i was talking aboutWell long story short the girl said he was helping her get “pleasure” by choking her and was pissed we interfered. Cops never pressed charges on him because the girl wouldn’t follow thru.
You get a +1 just for the Skeketor reference.
There is nothing without risk. A guy slaps a gal I’m watching to see what develops. A guy is stomping on someone’s head in a parking lot, I’m going to do something and just hope that folks have been filming. Not sure what “something” is in most situations, good to think about it.Need to ask yourself, is it worth it? Especially these days?
Well when I was 13, my cousion slamed my foot in the pantry door as I was comming out. A can of soup to they side of his head knocked him to his knees and got me a butt whooping..
What if you shoot him and the pregnant lady decides she didn't want her baby daddy executed?
Pop a caphttps://news.yahoo.com/brutal-attack-pregnant-woman-publix-145939784.html
Tanasia Kenney
Tue, October 25, 2022 at 10:59 AM
A bystander drew his gun on a man accused of beating and stomping on his pregnant girlfriend outside a Publix super market, ending the “brutal” attack, Florida deputies say.
The incident occurred around 5:15 p.m. Saturday, Oct. 22, in the parking lot of the Largo grocery store, according to an arrest affidavit.
The woman told Pinellas County deputies that her boyfriend, Cole Danisment, 27, got angry and punched her in the face repeatedly. She fell to the ground, and Danisment is then accused of stomping on her head and upper body.
The woman told deputies that Danisment knew she was 14 weeks pregnant with his unborn child.
A man who witnessed the attack said he feared for the woman’s life, prompting him to intervene. Danisment didn’t stop brutalizing the woman until the witness pulled a gun on him, according to the affidavit
Intervene or not? What if the perp didn't stop once the firearm was drawn?
Very true, but the cost could be you spending 5 years to life in prison, depending on the charges filed. A stranger is not worth it, for my family, I would not hesitate. In the modern political world we live in, being the good guy is very dangerous.The only thing necessary for evil to triumph in the world is that good men do nothing.
Disparity of force. I’m 57, average build (ie a little chubby) and if I believe that some 25 y/o is capable of beating his girlfriend nearly to death in a parking lot, then I’m going to avoid going hands on. It’s like being a lifeguard, you don’t get in the water with someone drowning if you don’t have to, reach, throw, row, go.Was Mr throat tattoo armed? Just wondering why a lot of people these days feel like they have to use a gun in a defense situation. Is it Covid? Why are people afraid to go hands on? Are those people automatically in fear of their life or just intimidated by aggression?
I understand in this situation the bystander may have felt like the womans life was in jeopardy, and maybe he had a physical ailment that prevented him from going hands on and maybe yada yada...
Genuine question, does a man's lack of confidence in his ability to use his hands in conflict resolution automatically make it acceptable to use a gun?
Again, this is a genuine question. I've been wrong before and you guys have helped me see the error in my ways.
Disparity of force. I’m 57, average build (ie a little chubby) and if I believe that some 25 y/o is capable of beating his girlfriend nearly to death in a parking lot, then I’m going to avoid going hands on. It’s like being a lifeguard, you don’t get in the water with someone drowning if you don’t have to, reach, throw, row, go.
Disparity of force. I’m 57, average build (ie a little chubby) and if I believe that some 25 y/o is capable of beating his girlfriend nearly to death in a parking lot, then I’m going to avoid going hands on. It’s like being a lifeguard, you don’t get in the water with someone drowning if you don’t have to, reach, throw, row, go.
I was going to say the same thing. At 56 years old, fat and bad shoulder, I have learned to work (fight) smarter, not harder. I would use every force multiplier I could get!
I understand and agree with all.I would never catch another wink of sleep if I let some pregnant lady get stomped to death in a supermarket parking lot.
How do you know he is going to stop at handing your butt to you in a whooping and not kill you if you go hands on and it goes bad for you? Do you put your gun down before going hands on? If not you are going to be constantly trying to keep his hands off of your gun. If it is a normal fight that doesn't warrant potential lethal force I'm not getting involved anyways so the point of it not warranting potential lethal force goes out of the window in defense of another.I understand and agree with all.
My question remains, if a man, without physical limitations, is afraid of getting his butt handed to him, is it acceptable to shoot an unarmed man?
I know, carry every step, every day and there is no such thing as a fair fight.
My assertion is society has gotten soft and without learning some of life's lessons the hard way it will continue a downward slope.
I know this is veering off topic and I'm not disagreeing with the fact that, in this particular situation the end result was good.
Genuine question, does a man's lack of confidence in his ability to use his hands in conflict resolution automatically make it acceptable to use a gun?
Again, this is a genuine question. I've been wrong before and you guys have helped me see the error in my ways.
I'm only 5'7". I don't like my odds of fighting somebody 6ft plus. especially now that i'm getting older, and ESPECIALLY since i blew out my knee 15 years ago. I know how healthy i was then, and i know how much it slowed me down. Even without the knee problem.. size and strength are disparity of force. If it weren't so, 5' women could go toe to toe with mike tyson.My question remains, if a man, without physical limitations, is afraid of getting his butt handed to him, is it acceptable to shoot an unarmed man?
I think it's acceptable. The judgement at the time is that the aggressor is in the process of doing great harm or killing someone, so at that point you can legally use force up to and including lethal force to protect the person.I understand and agree with all.
My question remains, if a man, without physical limitations, is afraid of getting his butt handed to him, is it acceptable to shoot an unarmed man?
I know, carry every step, every day and there is no such thing as a fair fight.
My assertion is society has gotten soft and without learning some of life's lessons the hard way it will continue a downward slope.
I know this is veering off topic and I'm not disagreeing with the fact that, in this particular situation the end result was good.
When I read statements like this, a particular word comes to mind. Dehumanization. We're talking about people not cattle. I see this kind of attitude more and more. Anytime someone gets hurt people seem like they're happy about it or at least completely indifferent. It's like there is no care for our fellow man anymore unless we personally know/like them. Kinda reminds me of something I read once.I would interfere only if she was my kin or someone I know.
Otherwise I consider it Culling the herd.
Most people are cattle these days.When I read statements like this, a particular word comes to mind. Dehumanization. We're talking about people not cattle. I see this kind of attitude more and more. Anytime someone gets hurt people seem like they're happy about it or at least completely indifferent. It's like there is no care for our fellow man anymore unless we personally know/like them. Kinda reminds me of something I read once.
Matthew 24:12 "And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold."
Thank you. The part in bold is what I was getting at. I feel like a certain segment of society doesn't understand a "normal fight" and know when to mind their own business.How do you know he is going to stop at handing your butt to you in a whooping and not kill you if you go hands on and it goes bad for you? Do you put your gun down before going hands on? If not you are going to be constantly trying to keep his hands off of your gun. If it is a normal fight that doesn't warrant potential lethal force I'm not getting involved anyways so the point of it not warranting potential lethal force goes out of the window in defense of another.
I'm not a big guy myself and have made a lot of bad decisions in the past, hence a couple scars on my head. But, I learned lessons about conflict resolution or if appropriate, avoidance.I'm only 5'7". I don't like my odds of fighting somebody 6ft plus. especially now that i'm getting older, and ESPECIALLY since i blew out my knee 15 years ago. I know how healthy i was then, and i know how much it slowed me down. Even without the knee problem.. size and strength are disparity of force. If it weren't so, 5' women could go toe to toe with mike tyson.
The short answer is no. You are allowed to use equal force. You can't shoot someone just cause you think you'd lose in a fight, not unless you want to go to jail.My question remains, if a man, without physical limitations, is afraid of getting his butt handed to him, is it acceptable to shoot an unarmed man?
I understand and agree with all.
My question remains, if a man, without physical limitations, is afraid of getting his butt handed to him, is it acceptable to shoot an unarmed man?
I know, carry every step, every day and there is no such thing as a fair fight.
My assertion is society has gotten soft and without learning some of life's lessons the hard way it will continue a downward slope.
I know this is veering off topic and I'm not disagreeing with the fact that, in this particular situation the end result was good.
I think where you're misunderstanding things is that there are some people who will say 'i'm gonna teach him the manners his parents should have" and give you a few lumps, and there are others that say "you don't disrespect me, i'm going to kill you" and then try. And there are others who say "hey that guy just got knocked down. let's crowd around him and kick him and somebody can jump up and down on his head"I'm not a big guy myself and have made a lot of bad decisions in the past, hence a couple scars on my head. But, I learned lessons about conflict resolution or if appropriate, avoidance.
Life isn't fair and the odds aren't always in your favor, but now that's not being taught and the soft society isn't allowing people to learn that. Nowadays its referred to as being " bullied."
Was Mr throat tattoo armed? Just wondering why a lot of people these days feel like they have to use a gun in a defense situation. Is it Covid? Why are people afraid to go hands on? Are those people automatically in fear of their life or just intimidated by aggression?
Hey now! let's be more respectful to cows. They at least server a purposes, more than can be said for most 2 legged turds out there.Most people are cattle these days.
It wasn't a normal fight that they were having so your point is moot in this case.Thank you. The part in bold is what I was getting at. I feel like a certain segment of society doesn't understand a "normal fight" and know when to mind their own business.
I'm not a big guy myself and have made a lot of bad decisions in the past, hence a couple scars on my head. But, I learned lessons about conflict resolution or if appropriate, avoidance.
Life isn't fair and the odds aren't always in your favor, but now that's not being taught and the soft society isn't allowing people to learn that. Nowadays its referred to as being " bullied."
It wasn't a normal fight that they were having so your point is moot in this case.
I understand and agree with all.
My question remains, if a man, without physical limitations, is afraid of getting his butt handed to him, is it acceptable to shoot an unarmed man?
I know, carry every step, every day and there is no such thing as a fair fight.
My assertion is society has gotten soft and without learning some of life's lessons the hard way it will continue a downward slope.
I know this is veering off topic and I'm not disagreeing with the fact that, in this particular situation the end result was good.
Could I beat the unholy hell out of some 25 year old whooping on a woman in parking lot? Maybe. What do I do when he pulls a knife or firearm at that point?
If something feels like it's going to be a tussle between me and another dude over some bullshit, then yeah, I'll go. If boots/feet/shoes are going to somebody's head, we've crossed the line from assault to attempted murder.
Bold from my previous comment upstream, in case you missed it.
Not one word of my statement implied I would be happy to see someone get hurt. But If you think I’m indifferent you’re correct. You said we’re talking people not cattle. Well, cattle are animals and these type of folks are animals. If a lion was attacking his lioness, or if a gorilla was beating his mate, I would not interfere. Why? Because it’s what animals do.When I read statements like this, a particular word comes to mind. Dehumanization. We're talking about people not cattle. I see this kind of attitude more and more. Anytime someone gets hurt people seem like they're happy about it or at least completely indifferent. It's like there is no care for our fellow man anymore unless we personally know/like them. Kinda reminds me of something I read once.
Matthew 24:12 "And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold."
Anybody that knows me from 25 years ago, knows that I would have sailed on that PAB in one second and hit him hard enough he would have heard his Granny singing in Heaven. Today, if you see me fighting, you'll know I'm outta bullets.Why are people afraid to go hands on? Are those people automatically in fear of their life or just intimidated by aggression?